Heart rhythm · 2019
Electrical parameters with His-bundle pacing: Considerations for automated programming.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Starr Neasa, Dayal Nicolas, Domenichini Giulia, Stettler Carine, Burri Haran
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Programming of His-bundle pacing may be challenging because current implantable pulse generators are not specifically designed for this pacing modality.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate electrical parameters in order to propose preset programming options with different configurations.
METHODS: Data were collected from 50 patients with His pacing leads connected to various ports (atrial, right ventricular, or left ventricular) of pacemakers and defibrillators during a detailed device interrogation, which included capture thresholds with various pacing vectors, measurement of timing intervals, and performance of automatic threshold algorithms.
RESULTS: His-bundle pacing thresholds were significantly lower during unipolar pacing compared to bipolar and extended bipolar polarities. However, current drain was offset due to lower impedance. The His pace-right ventricular sensed intervals were measured at 40-150 ms (mean 85 ± 25 ms), with the longest delays in patients with uncorrected right bundle branch block and selective His capture. This has implications for ventricular safety pacing windows (which were inactivated without evidence of crosstalk) and delays to minimize unnecessary ventricular backup pacing (which was also affected by refractory periods). The measured intervals also impacted the performance of automatic threshold algorithms, which performed differently depending on which port the His lead was connected to and did not distinguish between His and myocardial capture.
CONCLUSION: Our report provides data that could serve to configure automated programming settings to simplify management of His-bundle pacing.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate electrical parameters in order to propose preset programming options with different configurations.
METHODS: Data were collected from 50 patients with His pacing leads connected to various ports (atrial, right ventricular, or left ventricular) of pacemakers and defibrillators during a detailed device interrogation, which included capture thresholds with various pacing vectors, measurement of timing intervals, and performance of automatic threshold algorithms.
RESULTS: His-bundle pacing thresholds were significantly lower during unipolar pacing compared to bipolar and extended bipolar polarities. However, current drain was offset due to lower impedance. The His pace-right ventricular sensed intervals were measured at 40-150 ms (mean 85 ± 25 ms), with the longest delays in patients with uncorrected right bundle branch block and selective His capture. This has implications for ventricular safety pacing windows (which were inactivated without evidence of crosstalk) and delays to minimize unnecessary ventricular backup pacing (which was also affected by refractory periods). The measured intervals also impacted the performance of automatic threshold algorithms, which performed differently depending on which port the His lead was connected to and did not distinguish between His and myocardial capture.
CONCLUSION: Our report provides data that could serve to configure automated programming settings to simplify management of His-bundle pacing.