MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/crd.0000000000000191

Медицинская библиотека · Cardiology in review · 2018

His Bundle Pacing: Hemodynamics and Clinical Outcomes.

Patel Brijesh, Garg Jalaj, Chaudhary Rahul, Sablani Naveen, Gupta Rahul, Shah Mahek, Nazir Talha, Bozorgnia Babak, Natale Andrea

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

From 1993 to 2009, nearly 2.9 million pacemakers were implanted in the United States; the majority of which were dual-chamber pacemakers. One of the major physiologic advantages of dual-chamber pacing over single-chamber ventricular pacing is atrioventricular synchrony, which prevents the pacemaker syndrome. However, patients who are pacemaker dependent or use right ventricle (RV) apical pacing more than 40% of the time are at a risk of developing heart failure from electromechanical dyssynchrony. Studies have also shown that RV pacing results in nonphysiological activation of the left ventricle, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, alternative pacing sites, including the RV outflow tract, the high-RV septal region, bi-ventricular pacing, or His bundle pacing, have been explored for a better physiological electromechanical coupling of the ventricles. Although His bundle pacing has gained attention due to favorable data and clinical outcomes, it has not gained widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Hence, we aim to review the current experience with His bundle pacing and its clinical implications in this article.

Для цитирования: Patel Brijesh, Garg Jalaj, Chaudhary Rahul, Sablani Naveen, Gupta Rahul, Shah Mahek, Nazir Talha, Bozorgnia Babak, Natale Andrea. His Bundle Pacing: Hemodynamics and Clinical Outcomes.. Cardiology in review. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000191.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.