DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.06.011
[One-night-stand behavior and associated factors among young men who have sex with men in Wuhan, China].
Аннотация
Objective
This present study was to examine the prevalence and determinants of one-night-stand behavior among young men who have sex with men (YMSM).
Methods
A total of 403 YMSM aged 16 to 25 were recruited through internet promotion, extending activity and HIV VCT in Wuhan. Data was gathered through anonymous questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with one-night-stand behavior.
Results
Of the 398 YMSM, 48.99% (195/398) reported having had casual sex in the last 6 months. Of the ones having had casual sex, 34.29% (60/175) and 28.65% (49/171) reported using condoms consistently during anal or oral sexual contacts, respectively. These figures were lower than those of YMSM not having casual sexual contacts [with anal sex as 49.08% (80/163) and oral sex as 38.85% (61/157)]. 76.80% (149/194) of the YMSM reported having had multiple sexual partners, with the figure higher than those without [33.15% (60/181)] (P<0.01). Results from the logistic regression analysis showed that the following factors seemed to be associated with casual sex activities among YMSM, including: often using internet, (OR=4.89, 95%CI: 1.90-12.54), taking illegal drugs (OR=2.72, 95%CI: 1.60-4.63).
Conclusions
YMSM who had engaged in casual sex, practicing unprotected sex or having multiple sexual partners, were recognized as high risk population. Targeted intervention programs are needed to decrease the one-night-stand behavior. Internet intervention strategy seemed an important method to serve the purpose.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.