Current eye research · 2010
In vitro antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from patients with microbial keratitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reddy Ashok Kumar, Garg Prashant, Babu K Hari, Gopinathan Usha, Sharma Savitri
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin against rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from patients with keratitis.
METHODS: A total of 15 rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from corneal scrapings of keratitis patients from January 1999 through December 2007 were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the E-Test to amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin.
RESULTS: Out of 15 isolates, 13 were identified as Mycobacterium chelonae complex and 2 as Mycobacterium fortuitum complex. Based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) cut off, all 15 (100%) isolates were sensitive to amikacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, 13 (86%) were sensitive to tobramycin, nine (60%) to gatifloxacin, and only 6 (40%) to ciprofloxacin. The MIC range was 0.25-4 microg/ml for amikacin, 0.5-1 microg/ml for azithromycin, 0.125-1 microg/ml for clarithromycin, 0.5-16 microg/ml for ciprofloxacin, and 0.25-16 microg/ml for tobramycin. MIC(90) for amikacin was 2 microg/ml, azithromycin 1 microg/ml, clarithromycin 0.75 microg/ml, ciprofloxacin 8 microg/ml, gatifloxacin 8 microg/ml, and for tobramycin it was 4 microg/ml.
CONCLUSIONS: All the isolates were sensitive to amikacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, but the MIC values of clarithromycin and azithromycin were lower than amikacin. Based on in vitro susceptibility results it appears that the topical amikacin in combination with oral clarithromycin or azithromycin is the best treatment option for rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterial keratitis.
METHODS: A total of 15 rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from corneal scrapings of keratitis patients from January 1999 through December 2007 were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the E-Test to amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin.
RESULTS: Out of 15 isolates, 13 were identified as Mycobacterium chelonae complex and 2 as Mycobacterium fortuitum complex. Based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) cut off, all 15 (100%) isolates were sensitive to amikacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, 13 (86%) were sensitive to tobramycin, nine (60%) to gatifloxacin, and only 6 (40%) to ciprofloxacin. The MIC range was 0.25-4 microg/ml for amikacin, 0.5-1 microg/ml for azithromycin, 0.125-1 microg/ml for clarithromycin, 0.5-16 microg/ml for ciprofloxacin, and 0.25-16 microg/ml for tobramycin. MIC(90) for amikacin was 2 microg/ml, azithromycin 1 microg/ml, clarithromycin 0.75 microg/ml, ciprofloxacin 8 microg/ml, gatifloxacin 8 microg/ml, and for tobramycin it was 4 microg/ml.
CONCLUSIONS: All the isolates were sensitive to amikacin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, but the MIC values of clarithromycin and azithromycin were lower than amikacin. Based on in vitro susceptibility results it appears that the topical amikacin in combination with oral clarithromycin or azithromycin is the best treatment option for rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterial keratitis.