Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2015
Adjuvant eflornithine to maintain IPL-induced hair reduction in women with facial hirsutism: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vissing A C, Taudorf E H, Haak C S, Philipsen P A, Haedersdal M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Photoepilation is the treatment of choice for hair removal in patients with hirsutism, but it remains a challenge to prevent regrowth of hairs.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate whether topical eflornithine maintains hair reduction in hirsute patients after cessation of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy.
METHODS: A randomized, split-face, single-blinded controlled trial on topical eflornithine vs. no eflornithine treatment (control) after 5-6 IPL-treatments in 22 women with facial hirsutism. Application of eflornithine was initiated after the final IPL-treatment (baseline) and applied twice daily for 6 months to half of the face. Patients were assessed at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after the final IPL-treatment. The primary endpoint was difference in facial hair counts between eflornithine vs. no treatment. Secondary endpoints were patient-evaluated efficacy, patient satisfaction and safety.
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients completed the study protocol. At 1 month after final IPL-treatment, eflornithine reduced hair regrowth by 14% (P = 0.007, n = 20 patients), at 3 months by 9% (P = 0.107, n = 19) and at 6 months by 17% (P = 0.048, n = 18) compared to no treatment. Patient-evaluated efficacy supported blinded hair counts and patients were satisfied with eflornithine treatment throughout the study (median VAS 5-6). Eflornithine was generally well tolerated, but blinded evaluation demonstrated deterioration of acne in two patients at final assessment.
CONCLUSION: Topical eflornithine provides a self-administered treatment with a potential to maintain IPL-induced hair reduction in hirsute patients.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate whether topical eflornithine maintains hair reduction in hirsute patients after cessation of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy.
METHODS: A randomized, split-face, single-blinded controlled trial on topical eflornithine vs. no eflornithine treatment (control) after 5-6 IPL-treatments in 22 women with facial hirsutism. Application of eflornithine was initiated after the final IPL-treatment (baseline) and applied twice daily for 6 months to half of the face. Patients were assessed at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after the final IPL-treatment. The primary endpoint was difference in facial hair counts between eflornithine vs. no treatment. Secondary endpoints were patient-evaluated efficacy, patient satisfaction and safety.
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients completed the study protocol. At 1 month after final IPL-treatment, eflornithine reduced hair regrowth by 14% (P = 0.007, n = 20 patients), at 3 months by 9% (P = 0.107, n = 19) and at 6 months by 17% (P = 0.048, n = 18) compared to no treatment. Patient-evaluated efficacy supported blinded hair counts and patients were satisfied with eflornithine treatment throughout the study (median VAS 5-6). Eflornithine was generally well tolerated, but blinded evaluation demonstrated deterioration of acne in two patients at final assessment.
CONCLUSION: Topical eflornithine provides a self-administered treatment with a potential to maintain IPL-induced hair reduction in hirsute patients.