Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2021
Is interstitial photodynamic therapy for brain tumors ready for clinical practice? A systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leroy Henri-Arthur, Guérin Laura, Lecomte Fabienne, Baert Grégory, Vignion Anne-Sophie, Mordon Serge, Reyns Nicolas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Interstitial photodynamic therapy (iPDT), inserting optical fibers inside brain tumors, has been proposed for more than 30 years. While a promising therapeutic option, it is still an experimental treatment, with different ways of application, depending on the team performing the technique.
OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we reported the patient selection process, the treatment parameters, the potential adverse events and the oncological outcomes related to iPDT treatment applied to brain tumors.
METHODS: We performed a search in PubMed, Embase and Medline based on the following Mesh terms: "interstitial" AND "photodynamic therapy" AND "brain tumor" OR "glioma" OR glioblastoma" from January 1990 to April 2020. We screened 350 studies. Twelve matched all selection criteria.
RESULTS: 251 patients underwent iPDT. Tumors were mainly de novo or recurrent high-grade gliomas (171 (68%) of glioblastomas), located supratentorial, with a median volume of 12 cm3. Hematoporphyrin derive agent (HpD) or protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was used as a photosensitizer. Up to 6 optical fibers were introduced inside the tumor, delivering 200 mW/cm at a wavelength of 630 nm. Overall mortality was 1%. Transient and persistent morbidity were both 5%. No permanent deficit occurred using 5-ALA PDT. Tumor response rate after iPDT was 92% (IQR, 67; 99). Regarding glioblastomas, progression-free-survival was respectively 14.5 months (IQR, 13.8; 15.3) for de novo lesions and 14 months (IQR, 7; 30) for recurrent lesions, while overall survival was respectively 19 months (IQR, 14; 20) and 8 months (IQR, 6.3; 8.5). In patients harboring high-grade gliomas, 33 (13%) were considered long-term survivors (> 2 years) after iPDT.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of heterogeneity in its application, iPDT appears safe and efficient to treat brain tumors, especially high-grade gliomas. Stand-alone iPDT (i.e., without combined craniotomy and intracavitary PDT) using 5-ALA appears to be the best option in terms of controlling side effects: it avoids the occurrence of permanent neurological deficits while reducing the risks of hemorrhage and sepsis.
OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we reported the patient selection process, the treatment parameters, the potential adverse events and the oncological outcomes related to iPDT treatment applied to brain tumors.
METHODS: We performed a search in PubMed, Embase and Medline based on the following Mesh terms: "interstitial" AND "photodynamic therapy" AND "brain tumor" OR "glioma" OR glioblastoma" from January 1990 to April 2020. We screened 350 studies. Twelve matched all selection criteria.
RESULTS: 251 patients underwent iPDT. Tumors were mainly de novo or recurrent high-grade gliomas (171 (68%) of glioblastomas), located supratentorial, with a median volume of 12 cm3. Hematoporphyrin derive agent (HpD) or protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was used as a photosensitizer. Up to 6 optical fibers were introduced inside the tumor, delivering 200 mW/cm at a wavelength of 630 nm. Overall mortality was 1%. Transient and persistent morbidity were both 5%. No permanent deficit occurred using 5-ALA PDT. Tumor response rate after iPDT was 92% (IQR, 67; 99). Regarding glioblastomas, progression-free-survival was respectively 14.5 months (IQR, 13.8; 15.3) for de novo lesions and 14 months (IQR, 7; 30) for recurrent lesions, while overall survival was respectively 19 months (IQR, 14; 20) and 8 months (IQR, 6.3; 8.5). In patients harboring high-grade gliomas, 33 (13%) were considered long-term survivors (> 2 years) after iPDT.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of heterogeneity in its application, iPDT appears safe and efficient to treat brain tumors, especially high-grade gliomas. Stand-alone iPDT (i.e., without combined craniotomy and intracavitary PDT) using 5-ALA appears to be the best option in terms of controlling side effects: it avoids the occurrence of permanent neurological deficits while reducing the risks of hemorrhage and sepsis.