DOI 10.1097/iae.0000000000004114
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN FUNDUS AUTOFLUORESCENCE ABNORMALITY AND VISUAL FIELD LOSS IN BIETTI CRYSTALLINE DYSTROPHY.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefits of retinal pigment epithelium replacement therapy in patients with Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) by assessing the disease pathology with the distinctive relationship between fundus autofluorescence (FAF) abnormality and visual field defect.
METHODS
Sixteen eyes from 16 patients with BCD and 16 eyes from 16 patients with RHO-associated retinitis pigmentosa were included. Fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography, and Goldmann perimetry results were retrospectively reviewed and assessed using image analyses.
RESULTS
In patients with BCD, the FAF abnormality area was not correlated with the overall visual field defect area and median overall visual field defect area (57.5%) was smaller than FAF abnormality area (98.5%). By contrast, the ellipsoid zone width was significantly correlated with the central visual field area (r = 0.806, P < 0.001). In patients with RHO-associated retinitis pigmentosa, the FAF abnormality area and ellipsoid zone width were significantly correlated with the overall visual field defect area (r = 0.833, P < 0.001) and central visual field area (r = 0.887, P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The FAF abnormality shown in patients with BCD involves retinal pigment epithelium degeneration without complete loss of photoreceptors or visual function. These results suggest that patients with BCD are good candidates for retinal pigment epithelium replacement therapy for preservation of residual visual function.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.