Seminars in hematology · 2025
Report of Consensus Panel 4 from the 12th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia on the management of patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.
Consensus StatementСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tedeschi Alessandra, Auer Rebecca, Autore Francesco, Castillo Jorge J, Gatt Moshe E, Kimby Eva, Moreno David F, Owen Roger G, Qiu Lugui, Roccaro Aldo M, Sarosiek Shayna, Sekiguchi Naohiro, Seymour John F, Varettoni Marzia, Patterson Christopher J, Matous Jeffrey V, Buske Christian, Treon Steven P, Sanz Ramon Garcia
Аннотация
Approximately 95% of lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas (LPL) are IgM secreting and are characterized as Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). Conversely, non-IgM secreting LPL are rare. As part of the 12th International Workshop on WM (IWWM-12), a consensus panel of experts was tasked to develop recommendations for the management and response assessment of non-IgM LPL. The panel considered that in view of available molecular, pathological and clinical data, non-IgM LPL should be considered as a separate sub-entity of LPL. The panel further recommended that the IWWM-2 consensus criteria used for IgM LPL (WM) treatment initiation, should also be used for non-IgM LPL and be independent of IgG or IgA paraprotein level unless symptomatic hyperviscosity is present. The panel agreed that based on current evidence, there is insufficient data to support a different clinical management for non-IgM vs IgM (WM) LPL. Moreover, the panel advised that patients with non-IgM LPL should be treated in a similar manner to patients with IgM LPL independent of MYD88 mutation status until more is known about its impact on treatment outcomes for non-IgM LPL patients. The panel therefore recommends the use of the IWWM-11 IgM LPL (WM) response criteria for cases of non-IgM LPL with a monoclonal IgA or IgG paraprotein component, but creating a specific panel to develop formal response criteria for this LPL subset was also recommended.