Psychiatry research · 2025
2024 presidential election stress and its association with depression and anxiety among U.S. young adults: A two-wave survey study.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Chang, Woolverton G Alice, Rastogi Ritika, Menor Anthony, Hahm Hyeouk Chris, Liu Cindy H
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Presidential elections can be stressful for many people, with prior research linking election-related experiences to mental health outcomes. However, how specific election-related stressors contribute to depression and anxiety symptoms among young adults remains insufficiently examined. The purpose of this study is to address this gap by identifying which types of election-related stress are associated with these symptoms in U.S. young adults.
METHODS: This study analyzed data from two waves (2022 and 2024) of the CARES study, a longitudinal survey (N = 778). Logistic regression models examined associations between election-related stress factors and the odds of having symptoms consistent with moderate or more severe major depressive disorder (PHQ-8) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7).
RESULTS: Election anticipatory stress and news-related stress were associated with higher odds of risk for at least moderate major depressive disorder. News-related stress was linked to increased odds of risk for at least moderate generalized anxiety disorder. Stress about the election outcome showed no significant association with either depression or anxiety.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the mental health challenges young adults faced from election stress. News-related stress may have a broad impact on risks for depression and anxiety. Findings emphasize the need to distinguish different aspects of election stress. This study informs clinicians to target specific election-related stress contributing to depression and anxiety symptoms.
METHODS: This study analyzed data from two waves (2022 and 2024) of the CARES study, a longitudinal survey (N = 778). Logistic regression models examined associations between election-related stress factors and the odds of having symptoms consistent with moderate or more severe major depressive disorder (PHQ-8) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7).
RESULTS: Election anticipatory stress and news-related stress were associated with higher odds of risk for at least moderate major depressive disorder. News-related stress was linked to increased odds of risk for at least moderate generalized anxiety disorder. Stress about the election outcome showed no significant association with either depression or anxiety.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the mental health challenges young adults faced from election stress. News-related stress may have a broad impact on risks for depression and anxiety. Findings emphasize the need to distinguish different aspects of election stress. This study informs clinicians to target specific election-related stress contributing to depression and anxiety symptoms.