MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cea.13361

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019

Clinical and immunological differences between asymptomatic HDM-sensitized and HDM-allergic rhinitis patients.

Zidarn Mihaela, Robič Maša, Krivec Anja, Šilar Mira, Resch-Marat Yvonne, Vrtala Susanne, Kopač Peter, Bajrović Nissera, Valenta Rudolf, Korošec Peter

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Confirmation of the clinical relevance of sensitisation is important for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the usefulness of an in vitro basophil activation test and component-resolved diagnosis in distinguishing between symptomatic allergic rhinitis patients and asymptomatic sensitization to house dust mites (HDMs).

METHODS

Thirty-six subjects with a positive skin prick test (SPT) for HDM were divided into a symptomatic (n = 17) and an asymptomatic (n = 19) group on the basis of their clinical history and a nasal provocation test. A basophil CD63 response to in vitro stimulation with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus whole allergen extract and the IgE reactivity profiles for Der p 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 21, 23 were evaluated. Serum IgE and IgG specific to D pteronyssinus whole allergen extract and total IgE were measured.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the levels of IgE (IgE levels were higher in symptomatic patients with P = 0.055) and IgG specific to D pteronyssinus and total IgE. Symptomatic patients showed a lower threshold for in vitro basophil activation (3.33 ng/mL vs 33.3 ng/mL), a higher area under the curve (AUC) of basophil activation (171 vs 127) (P = 0.017), a higher response to positive control with anti-FcεRI stimulation (97% vs 79%) (P < 0.001), a recognition of more HDM allergens (4 vs 2) and more frequent sensitization to rDer p 7 (P = 0.016) and rDer p 23 compared to asymptomatic subjects (P = 0.018). There was a positive correlation (r = 0.63; P < 0.001) between the number of recognized allergens and the AUC of basophil activation.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the subjects studied, the differences in the basophil response to D pteronyssinus allergen extract, number of recognized HDM allergens and reactivity to rDer p 7 and rDer p 23 distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic HDM sensitisation better than SPT or allergen extract-specific IgE. Information regarding the clinical relevance of sensitization is important for the prescription of allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Для цитирования: Zidarn Mihaela, Robič Maša, Krivec Anja, Šilar Mira, Resch-Marat Yvonne, Vrtala Susanne, Kopač Peter, Bajrović Nissera, Valenta Rudolf, Korošec Peter. Clinical and immunological differences between asymptomatic HDM-sensitized and HDM-allergic rhinitis patients.. Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/cea.13361.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.