The American journal of medicine · 1988
Cefoperazone plus tobramycin versus ticarcillin plus tobramycin in febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gucalp R, Lia S, McKitrick J C, Wiernik P H
Аннотация
Cefoperazone plus tobramycin was compared in a prospective, randomized trial with our standard regimen of ticarcillin plus tobramycin as empiric therapy of fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. Patients who received cefoperazone were also given vitamin K (5 mg orally twice a week). Of 39 microbiologically and clinically documented infections treated with ticarcillin plus tobramycin, 28 (72 percent) showed improvement. Of 27 microbiologically and clinically documented infections treated with cefoperazone plus tobramycin, 21 (78 percent) showed improvement. The overall response rates were similar (40 of 53, or 74 percent, for ticarcillin plus tobramycin versus 38 of 48, or 79 percent for cefoperazone plus tobramycin). There was no difference in response between groups according to site of infection. Serious side effects were minimal with both regimens. There were no enterococcal superinfections in patients receiving cefoperazone. These results suggest that the overall efficacy and toxicity of study regimens are similar.