MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/a-2901-9309

Медицинская библиотека · RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2026

The Accuracy of Photon-Counting CT Angiography of the Coronaries Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Haag Nina Pauline, Katz Maria Sophie, Wiemer Marcus, Kaese Sven, Saeed Saher, Borggrefe Jan, Kröger Jan Robert

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of photon-counting coronary CT angiography (PCCT-CCTA) for assessing coronary artery stenosis, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

90 adult patients who underwent PCCT-CCTA followed by consecutive ICA were included in this retrospective single-center study. PCCT-CCTA examinations were performed in standard-resolution or ultra-high resolution. Image quality, coronary stenosis severity, and CAD-RADS 2.0 classifications were assessed by blinded experienced radiologists. ICA findings served as the reference standard. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank testing, Spearman correlation, ROC analysis, and calculation of overestimation, underestimation, and concordance rates.

RESULTS

The overall image quality was excellent (median Likert score 5). PCCT-CCTA demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value for identifying patients requiring invasive therapy at a CAD-RADS score >3, but the specificity was low. PCCT-CCTA significantly differed from ICA in stenosis grading (p = 0.001) and showed a tendency to overestimate stenosis severity, particularly in mild to moderate lesions. The overall overestimation rate was 66.8%, the underestimation rate was 9.3%, and the concordance rate was 23.9%. Ultra-high resolution improved the detection of severe stenoses but did not eliminate overestimation. The CAD-RADS score demonstrated limited discriminatory performance for therapy prediction (AUC 0.581). No significant correlations were found between Agatston score, CAD-RADS 2.0 classification, and image quality.

CONCLUSION

PCCT-CCTA reliably identifies patients requiring invasive coronary therapy but tends to overestimate stenosis severity compared with ICA. Despite this limitation, PCCT-CCTA represents a valuable noninvasive gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography.

KEY POINTS: · PCCT-CCTA reliably identifies patients requiring invasive coronary therapy.. · Ultra-high resolution improves severe stenosis detection but not specificity.. · Calcium score does not predict stenosis severity..

CITATION FORMAT: · Haag NP, Katz MS, Wiemer M et al. The Accuracy of Photon-Counting CT Angiography of the Coronaries Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography. Rofo 2026; DOI 10.1055/a-2901-9309.

Для цитирования: Haag Nina Pauline, Katz Maria Sophie, Wiemer Marcus, Kaese Sven, Saeed Saher, Borggrefe Jan, Kröger Jan Robert. The Accuracy of Photon-Counting CT Angiography of the Coronaries Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography.. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2026. DOI: 10.1055/a-2901-9309.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.