British heart journal · 1993
Chronotropic response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation: relation to functional state.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van den Berg M P, Crijns H J, Gosselink A T, van den Broek S A, Hillege H J, van Veldhuisen D J, Lie K I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between functional capacity and heart rate response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation.
SUBJECTS: 73 consecutive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relation between functional capacity, measured as peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2; ml/min/kg), and heart rate at all stages of exercise in univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Peak VO2 showed no correlation with resting heart rate, but it showed a negative correlation with heart rate during the first stage of exercise (r = -0.94, p < 0.01). Indeed, heart rate during the early stages of exercise (stages 1-5) was higher in patients with a peak VO2 less than or equal to 20 ml/mm/kg than in those with a peak VO2 greater than 20 ml/min/kg (heart rate 140 v 125 beats/min, p < 0.05). At maximal exercise, however, peak VO2 was positively correlated with heart rate (r = 2.15, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In patients with atrial fibrillation and impaired functional capacity heart rate at low levels of exercise is augmented but maximal heart rate attenuated compared with patients with preserved functional capacity. Excessive heart rate responses to minor exercise may have deleterious effects on left ventricular function and thereby further limit functional capacity.
SUBJECTS: 73 consecutive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relation between functional capacity, measured as peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2; ml/min/kg), and heart rate at all stages of exercise in univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Peak VO2 showed no correlation with resting heart rate, but it showed a negative correlation with heart rate during the first stage of exercise (r = -0.94, p < 0.01). Indeed, heart rate during the early stages of exercise (stages 1-5) was higher in patients with a peak VO2 less than or equal to 20 ml/mm/kg than in those with a peak VO2 greater than 20 ml/min/kg (heart rate 140 v 125 beats/min, p < 0.05). At maximal exercise, however, peak VO2 was positively correlated with heart rate (r = 2.15, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In patients with atrial fibrillation and impaired functional capacity heart rate at low levels of exercise is augmented but maximal heart rate attenuated compared with patients with preserved functional capacity. Excessive heart rate responses to minor exercise may have deleterious effects on left ventricular function and thereby further limit functional capacity.