Evaluating large language models for WAO/EAACI guideline compliance in hereditary angioedema management.

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disorder characterized by recurrent swelling episodes. Adherence to clinical guidelines, such as the World Allergy Organization/European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology (WAO/EAACI) guidelines, is crucial for effective management. With the increasing role of artificial intelligence in medicine, large language models (LLMs) offer potential for clinical decision support. This study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Copilot in providing guideline-adherent responses for HAE management.

METHODS

Twenty-eight key recommendations from the WAO/EAACI HAE guidelines were reformulated into interrogative formats and posed to the selected LLMs. Two independent clinicians assessed responses based on accuracy, adequacy, clarity, and citation reliability using a five-point Likert scale. References were categorized as guideline-based, trustworthy, or untrustworthy. A reevaluation with explicit citation instructions was conducted, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

ChatGPT and Gemini outperformed Perplexity and Copilot, achieving median accuracy and adequacy scores of 5.0 versus 3.0, respectively. ChatGPT had the lowest rate of unreliable references, whereas Gemini showed inconsistency in citation behavior. Significant differences in response quality were observed among models (p < 0.001). Providing explicit sourcing instructions improved performance consistency, particularly for Gemini.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT and Gemini demonstrated superior adherence to WAO/EAACI guidelines, suggesting that LLMs can support clinical decision-making in rare diseases. However, inconsistencies in citation practices highlight the need for further validation and optimization to enhance reliability in medical applications.