MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1755-148x.2011.00873.x

Медицинская библиотека · Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2011

Clinical outcome and pathological features associated with NRAS mutation in cutaneous melanoma.

Devitt Bianca, Liu Wendy, Salemi Renato, Wolfe Rory, Kelly John, Tzen Chin-Yuan, Dobrovic Alexander, McArthur Grant

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The effect of NRAS mutations on the pathological features and clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous melanoma was compared with that of tumors containing BRAF(V600E) mutations and tumors wild type for both (WT). Clinical outcome data were obtained from a prospective cohort of 249 patients. Mutations involving NRAS and BRAF(V600E) were detected by PCR and were sequence verified. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to relate NRAS and BRAF mutations to clinical outcome. Seventy-five percentage of NRAS mutations occurred in tumors >1 mm thick (BRAF(V600E) 40%, WT 34%); 75% of NRAS mutations had >1 mitosis/mm(2) (BRAF(V600E) 40%, WT 55%). When compared to WT, multivariate analysis of melanoma-specific survival (MSS) identified NRAS mutations as an adverse prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) 2.96; P = 0.04] but not BRAF(V600E) mutations (HR 1.73; P = 0.23). NRAS mutations were associated with thicker tumors and higher rates of mitosis when compared to BRAF(V600E) and WT melanoma and independently of this, with shorter MSS.

Для цитирования: Devitt Bianca, Liu Wendy, Salemi Renato, Wolfe Rory, Kelly John, Tzen Chin-Yuan, Dobrovic Alexander, McArthur Grant. Clinical outcome and pathological features associated with NRAS mutation in cutaneous melanoma.. Pigment cell & melanoma research. 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-148x.2011.00873.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.