Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 1984
Efficacy of CW-Doppler and duplex system examinations for the evaluation of extracranial carotid disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hennerici M, Freund H J
Аннотация
The efficacy of different ultrasound methods for the detection of extracranial arterial disease (EAD) was evaluated on the basis of the comparison with angiography. High-resolution B-scan imaging combined with a multigated pulsed Doppler flow pattern analysis (Duplex system) achieved the best results for the detection of morphological and hemodynamic changes of nonstenotic lesions and low grade stenosis. However, a technically unsatisfactory examination rate of 19%, the failure to differentiate between total and subtotal carotid occlusions, underestimation of significant stenosis and impracticable vertebral flow studies were disadvantages of the Duplex technique. CW-Doppler examinations proved to be more precise and more reliable for the detection of significant stenosis and occlusions. Since vertebral blood flow studies were impractical with the Duplex system, CW-Doppler provides more comprehensive information about the hemodynamics of cerebral blood supply.