Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
Development of a Question Prompt List for People Living With Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Delphi Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Werner Ellen, van Hooff Maria C B, Weijsters Gemma H X, Abbas Nadir, Gerussi Alessio, Willemse José A, Mitchell-Thain Robert, Leburgue Angela, Hirschfield Gideon M, Corpechot Christophe, Schramm Christoph, Levy Cynthia, Nevens Frederik, Verbeek Jef, Mason Andrew L, Dalekos George, Cazzagon Nora, Mells George F, Kowdley Kris V, Carbone Marco, Jones David E, Hansen Bettina E, Trivedi Palak J, van der Meer Adriaan J, Global PBC Study Group/ERN RARE-LIVER/Question Prompt List
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical practice guidelines support caregivers to manage liver diseases. However, people with lifelong conditions often lack guidance to understand what aspects of care are most important and how their disease should be managed. This study aimed to create a question prompt list (QPL) for individuals with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) including key questions (directed) to their treating physician that are most likely to improve their outcome.
METHODS: International PBC professionals including patient representatives rated and ranked questions related to 9 aspects of PBC care. Questions rated by >70% as moderately/very important were considered best candidate questions (BCQs) for the QPL. Results of the survey were discussed during 2 in-person meetings, upon which the questions and/or QPL were amended.
RESULTS: Based on 108 respondents, 11 of 43 questions were considered BCQs. After 2 in-person meetings (64 attendees), the final QPL contained 8 questions and was unanimously approved by 19 members of the study team during the consensus meeting. The included questions referred to the risk of disease progression, presence of cirrhosis, need of second-line therapy, need of repeated liver stiffness measurements, bone health, and availability of patient information and support. Two BCQs addressing options to manage pruritus and fatigue were combined on the QPL. In addition, one question regarding first-line therapy was included despite being rated as moderately/very important by 68.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The PBC patient question prompt list serves as a user-facing document, to enhance the patient experience, and drive value-based healthcare in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: International PBC professionals including patient representatives rated and ranked questions related to 9 aspects of PBC care. Questions rated by >70% as moderately/very important were considered best candidate questions (BCQs) for the QPL. Results of the survey were discussed during 2 in-person meetings, upon which the questions and/or QPL were amended.
RESULTS: Based on 108 respondents, 11 of 43 questions were considered BCQs. After 2 in-person meetings (64 attendees), the final QPL contained 8 questions and was unanimously approved by 19 members of the study team during the consensus meeting. The included questions referred to the risk of disease progression, presence of cirrhosis, need of second-line therapy, need of repeated liver stiffness measurements, bone health, and availability of patient information and support. Two BCQs addressing options to manage pruritus and fatigue were combined on the QPL. In addition, one question regarding first-line therapy was included despite being rated as moderately/very important by 68.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The PBC patient question prompt list serves as a user-facing document, to enhance the patient experience, and drive value-based healthcare in routine clinical practice.