MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101537

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of hepatology · 2024

Evaluation of four chatbots in autoimmune liver disease: A comparative analysis.

Daza Jimmy, Bezerra Lucas Soares, Santamaría Laura, Rueda-Esteban Roberto, Bantel Heike, Girala Marcos, Ebert Matthias, Van Bömmel Florian, Geier Andreas, Aldana Andres Gomez, Yau Kevin, Alvares-da-Silva Mario, Peck-Radosavljevic Markus, Ridruejo Ezequiel, Weinmann Arndt, Teufel Andreas

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are rare and require precise evaluation, which is often challenging for medical providers. Chatbots are innovative solutions to assist healthcare professionals in clinical management. In our study, ten liver specialists systematically evaluated four chatbots to determine their utility as clinical decision support tools in the field of AILDs.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We constructed a 56-question questionnaire focusing on AILD evaluation, diagnosis, and management of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). Four chatbots -ChatGPT 3.5, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Bard- were presented with the questions in their free tiers in December 2023. Responses underwent critical evaluation by ten liver specialists using a standardized 1 to 10 Likert scale. The analysis included mean scores, the number of highest-rated replies, and the identification of common shortcomings in chatbots performance.

RESULTS

Among the assessed chatbots, specialists rated Claude highest with a mean score of 7.37 (SD = 1.91), followed by ChatGPT (7.17, SD = 1.89), Microsoft Copilot (6.63, SD = 2.10), and Google Bard (6.52, SD = 2.27). Claude also excelled with 27 best-rated replies, outperforming ChatGPT (20), while Microsoft Copilot and Google Bard lagged with only 6 and 9, respectively. Common deficiencies included listing details over specific advice, limited dosing options, inaccuracies for pregnant patients, insufficient recent data, over-reliance on CT and MRI imaging, and inadequate discussion regarding off-label use and fibrates in PBC treatment. Notably, internet access for Microsoft Copilot and Google Bard did not enhance precision compared to pre-trained models.

CONCLUSIONS

Chatbots hold promise in AILD support, but our study underscores key areas for improvement. Refinement is needed in providing specific advice, accuracy, and focused up-to-date information. Addressing these shortcomings is essential for enhancing the utility of chatbots in AILD management, guiding future development, and ensuring their effectiveness as clinical decision-support tools.

Для цитирования: Daza Jimmy, Bezerra Lucas Soares, Santamaría Laura, Rueda-Esteban Roberto, Bantel Heike, Girala Marcos, Ebert Matthias, Van Bömmel Florian, Geier Andreas, Aldana Andres Gomez, Yau Kevin, Alvares-da-Silva Mario, Peck-Radosavljevic Markus, Ridruejo Ezequiel, Weinmann Arndt, Teufel Andreas. Evaluation of four chatbots in autoimmune liver disease: A comparative analysis.. Annals of hepatology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101537.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.