Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2013
[Comparison study of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration and transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lesions].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Qi, Cao Chang-qi, Li Shi-jie, Yan Yan, Li Xiang-ju, Yan Shi, Wu Nan, Zhang Ji-chang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the values of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and TBNA for the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lesions.
METHODS: The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA (n=50) and TBNA (n=50) between January 2010 and May 2011 were retrospectively reviewed, and the results and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 121 lesions in the 100 patients were evaluated, the sample yeilds of EBUS-TBNA and TBNA were 90.6% and 78.9% and the diagnostic accuracy rates in the two groups were 90.0% and 72.0%(P=0.022), respectively. No major complications happened. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were higher and the complication rate was not increased as compared with TBNA.
CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA has a higher diagnostic yield for the evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lesions.
METHODS: The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA (n=50) and TBNA (n=50) between January 2010 and May 2011 were retrospectively reviewed, and the results and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 121 lesions in the 100 patients were evaluated, the sample yeilds of EBUS-TBNA and TBNA were 90.6% and 78.9% and the diagnostic accuracy rates in the two groups were 90.0% and 72.0%(P=0.022), respectively. No major complications happened. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were higher and the complication rate was not increased as compared with TBNA.
CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA has a higher diagnostic yield for the evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lesions.