Investigative radiology · 2009
Flow assessment through four heart valves simultaneously using 3-dimensional 3-directional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging with retrospective valve tracking in healthy volunteers and patients with valvular regurgitation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roes Stijntje D, Hammer Sebastiaan, van der Geest Rob J, Marsan Nina Ajmone, Bax Jeroen J, Lamb Hildo J, Reiber Johan H C, de Roos Albert, Westenberg Jos J M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To validate 3-dimensional (3D) 3-directional velocity-encoded (VE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for flow assessment through all 4 heart valves simultaneously with retrospective valve-tracking during off-line analysis in healthy volunteers and in patients with valvular regurgitation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three-dimensional 3-directional VE MRI was performed in 22 healthy volunteers and in 29 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were suspected of valvular regurgitation and net flow volumes through the 4 heart valves were compared. Furthermore, the analysis was repeated for each valve in 10 healthy volunteers and in 10 regurgitant valves to assess intra- and interobserver agreement for assessment of respectively net flow volumes and regurgitation fraction.
RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, the average net flow volume through the mitral valve, tricuspid valve, aortic valve, and pulmonary valve was 85 +/- 20 mL, 85 +/- 21 mL, 83 +/- 19 mL, 82 +/- 21 mL, respectively. Strong correlations between net flow volumes through the 4 heart valves were observed (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] 0.93-0.95) and the coefficient of variance (CV) was small (6%-9%). The repeated analysis by the same observer and by a second observer yielded good agreement for measurement of net flow volumes (ICC: 0.93-0.99 and CV: 3%-7%). Strong correlations between the net flow volumes through the 4 heart valves were also observed in the patients with valvular regurgitation (ICC: 0.85-0.95 and CV: 7%-18%). The average net flow volume through the mitral valve, tricuspid valve, aortic valve, and pulmonary valve was 63 +/- 20 mL, 63 +/- 20 mL, 63 +/- 20 mL, 63 +/- 20 mL, respectively. Furthermore, the intra- and interobserver agreement for assessment of regurgitation fraction was good (ICC: 0.86 and 0.85, CV: 12% and 13%).
CONCLUSIONS: Flow assessment using 3D 3-directional VE MR with retrospective valve-tracking during off-line analysis enables accurate quantification of net flow volumes through 4 heart valves within a single acquisition in healthy volunteers and in patients with valvular regurgitation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three-dimensional 3-directional VE MRI was performed in 22 healthy volunteers and in 29 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were suspected of valvular regurgitation and net flow volumes through the 4 heart valves were compared. Furthermore, the analysis was repeated for each valve in 10 healthy volunteers and in 10 regurgitant valves to assess intra- and interobserver agreement for assessment of respectively net flow volumes and regurgitation fraction.
RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, the average net flow volume through the mitral valve, tricuspid valve, aortic valve, and pulmonary valve was 85 +/- 20 mL, 85 +/- 21 mL, 83 +/- 19 mL, 82 +/- 21 mL, respectively. Strong correlations between net flow volumes through the 4 heart valves were observed (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] 0.93-0.95) and the coefficient of variance (CV) was small (6%-9%). The repeated analysis by the same observer and by a second observer yielded good agreement for measurement of net flow volumes (ICC: 0.93-0.99 and CV: 3%-7%). Strong correlations between the net flow volumes through the 4 heart valves were also observed in the patients with valvular regurgitation (ICC: 0.85-0.95 and CV: 7%-18%). The average net flow volume through the mitral valve, tricuspid valve, aortic valve, and pulmonary valve was 63 +/- 20 mL, 63 +/- 20 mL, 63 +/- 20 mL, 63 +/- 20 mL, respectively. Furthermore, the intra- and interobserver agreement for assessment of regurgitation fraction was good (ICC: 0.86 and 0.85, CV: 12% and 13%).
CONCLUSIONS: Flow assessment using 3D 3-directional VE MR with retrospective valve-tracking during off-line analysis enables accurate quantification of net flow volumes through 4 heart valves within a single acquisition in healthy volunteers and in patients with valvular regurgitation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAortic Valve InsufficiencyBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMitral Valve InsufficiencyPulmonary Valve InsufficiencyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTricuspid Valve Insufficiency