Gynecologic oncology · 2016
A prospective study evaluating diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in suspected gynecologic malignancies.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fehniger Julia, Thomas Stephen, Lengyel Ernst, Liao Chuanhong, Tenney Meaghan, Oto Aytekin, Yamada S Diane
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the ability of DW-MRI and CT to detect sites of peritoneal dissemination in gynecologic malignancies. The reproducibility of DW-MRI and CT interpretation between radiologists was also assessed.
METHODS: Single institution prospective cohort study of women with suspected advanced gynecologic cancer who underwent surgical staging from 2010 to 2013. Participants underwent both DW-MRI and contrast-enhanced CT prior to surgery. Radiologists and surgeons were blinded, respectively, to surgical and DW-MRI results. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for each disease site for CT and DW-MRI and compared to surgical findings. Kappa statistics quantified interobserver agreement between both radiologists.
RESULTS: Twenty seven patients were enrolled. Mean age at surgery was 59years. Ninety percent of participants had stage IIIC/IV disease. For right diaphragm disease, the AUC for DW-MRI was 0.95 compared to 0.81 for CT. For left diaphragm disease, the AUC was 0.89 for DW-MRI compared to 0.74 for CT. The AUC was similar for DW-MRI and CT for omental disease (0.79 versus 0.64); the liver surface (0.61 versus 0.67); bowel mesentery (0.73 versus 0.64); and cul de sac (0.75 versus 0.64). Interobserver agreement for DW-MRI was greater than CT for omental, Morrison's pouch, liver surface, and right diaphragm disease.
CONCLUSIONS: DW-MRI detects right diaphragmatic disease found at surgery with greater accuracy than CT. For other disease sites key to surgical planning, DW-MRI is equivalent to CT. Interobserver agreement was superior for a majority of disease sites evaluated by DW-MRI compared to CT.
METHODS: Single institution prospective cohort study of women with suspected advanced gynecologic cancer who underwent surgical staging from 2010 to 2013. Participants underwent both DW-MRI and contrast-enhanced CT prior to surgery. Radiologists and surgeons were blinded, respectively, to surgical and DW-MRI results. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for each disease site for CT and DW-MRI and compared to surgical findings. Kappa statistics quantified interobserver agreement between both radiologists.
RESULTS: Twenty seven patients were enrolled. Mean age at surgery was 59years. Ninety percent of participants had stage IIIC/IV disease. For right diaphragm disease, the AUC for DW-MRI was 0.95 compared to 0.81 for CT. For left diaphragm disease, the AUC was 0.89 for DW-MRI compared to 0.74 for CT. The AUC was similar for DW-MRI and CT for omental disease (0.79 versus 0.64); the liver surface (0.61 versus 0.67); bowel mesentery (0.73 versus 0.64); and cul de sac (0.75 versus 0.64). Interobserver agreement for DW-MRI was greater than CT for omental, Morrison's pouch, liver surface, and right diaphragm disease.
CONCLUSIONS: DW-MRI detects right diaphragmatic disease found at surgery with greater accuracy than CT. For other disease sites key to surgical planning, DW-MRI is equivalent to CT. Interobserver agreement was superior for a majority of disease sites evaluated by DW-MRI compared to CT.