MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.olq.0000152823.10388.99

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 2005

The legal status of patient-delivered partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections in the United States: a national survey of state medical and pharmacy boards.

Golden Matthew R, Anukam Uzoeshi, Williams Donald H, Handsfield H Hunter

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to define the legal status of patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) in the United States.

STUDY: A survey of directors of state boards of pharmacy and medicine in the 50 United States and the District of Columbia was performed.

RESULTS

Completed surveys were returned by 37 (72%) pharmacy boards and 37 (72%) medical boards representing 47 states. PDPT was clearly defined as legal in four states. PDPT was regarded as illegal by 16 (43%) medical boards and 19 (51%) pharmacy boards and as of uncertain legality by 16 (43%) medical boards and 14 (38%) pharmacy boards. Most boards (88%) that regarded PDPT as illegal or of uncertain legality indicated that the issue had never been addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

The legal status of PDPT is uncertain in much of the U.S., and the practice is often considered illegal. New laws or legal rulings will be needed if PDPT is to be widely promoted.

Для цитирования: Golden Matthew R, Anukam Uzoeshi, Williams Donald H, Handsfield H Hunter. The legal status of patient-delivered partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections in the United States: a national survey of state medical and pharmacy boards.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000152823.10388.99.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.