Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2021
Usefulness of deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies in diagnosing coeliac disease in children younger than 3 years old.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hill Madison, Watkins Runa, Leonard-Puppa Elaine, Waddell Jaylyn, Blanchard Samra, Kader Howard
Аннотация
AIM: The standard serological test to screen for coeliac disease (CD) is tissue transglutaminase (tTG) but some experts recommend including deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibodies for children younger than 3 years old. This study evaluated the utility of DGP-immunoglobulin A (IgA) and DGP-immunoglobulin G (IgG) serologies when screening children younger than 3 years old for CD.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted including children 3 years old and under, who had DGP and/or tTG serologies along with duodenal biopsies during their initial diagnostic evaluation. Serology results were compared to the gold-standard histopathology by χ2 to determine the significance of including DGP-IgG/IgA serologies when screening for CD in this age group.
RESULTS: We identified 478 patients, 52 who were younger than 3 years old, 43 of whom met inclusion criteria. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the DGP-IgA test was 91.7% whereas, DGP-IgG was 77.8%. When DGP serology was examined in conjunction with tTG-IgA, the PPV with DGP-IgA was 90.9% and with DGP-IgG was 87.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: In isolation, DGP-IgA provides a high PPV and specificity for CD in children younger than 3 years old, whereas DGP-IgG had a much lower PPV in this age group. When used alone or in conjunction with tTG-IgA, the DGP-IgA test results in a high PPV of 91.7 and 90.9%, respectively. Based on our study, we recommend obtaining both the DGP-IgA and the tTG-IgA serology when screening infants and children younger than 3 years old for coeliac disease.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted including children 3 years old and under, who had DGP and/or tTG serologies along with duodenal biopsies during their initial diagnostic evaluation. Serology results were compared to the gold-standard histopathology by χ2 to determine the significance of including DGP-IgG/IgA serologies when screening for CD in this age group.
RESULTS: We identified 478 patients, 52 who were younger than 3 years old, 43 of whom met inclusion criteria. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the DGP-IgA test was 91.7% whereas, DGP-IgG was 77.8%. When DGP serology was examined in conjunction with tTG-IgA, the PPV with DGP-IgA was 90.9% and with DGP-IgG was 87.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: In isolation, DGP-IgA provides a high PPV and specificity for CD in children younger than 3 years old, whereas DGP-IgG had a much lower PPV in this age group. When used alone or in conjunction with tTG-IgA, the DGP-IgA test results in a high PPV of 91.7 and 90.9%, respectively. Based on our study, we recommend obtaining both the DGP-IgA and the tTG-IgA serology when screening infants and children younger than 3 years old for coeliac disease.