Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024
Latent profile analysis reveals the central role of psychological symptoms in driving disease severity in chronic constipation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abber Sophie R, Buchanan Kelly L, Clukey Jenna, Joiner Thomas E, Staller Kyle, Burton-Murray Helen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation (CC) is defined by symptom criteria reflecting heterogenous physiology. However, many patients with CC have significant psychological comorbidities-an alternative definition using a biopsychosocial classification model could be warranted to inform future treatments. We sought to: (1) empirically derive psychological symptom profiles of patients with CC using latent profile analysis and (2) validate these profiles by comparing them on symptom severity, GI-specific anxiety, body mass index (BMI), and anorectal manometry findings.
METHODS: Participants included adults presenting for anorectal manometry for CC (N = 468, 82% female, Mage = 47). Depression/anxiety symptoms and eating disorder (ED) symptoms (EAT-26) were used as indicators (i.e., variables used to derive profiles) representing unique psychological constructs. Constipation symptoms, GI-specific anxiety, BMI, and anorectal manometry results were used as validators (i.e., variables used to examine the clinical utility of the resulting profiles).
KEY RESULTS: A 5-profile solution provided the best statistical fit, comprising the following latent profiles (LPs): LP1 termed "high dieting, low bulimia;" LP2 termed "high ED symptoms;" LP3 termed "moderate ED symptoms;" LP4 termed "high anxiety and depression, low ED symptoms;" and LP5 termed "low psychological symptoms." The low psychological symptom profile (61% of the sample) had lower abdominal and overall constipation severity and lower GI-specific anxiety compared to the four profiles characterized by higher psychological symptoms (of any type). Profiles did not significantly differ on BMI or anorectal manometry results.
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Profiles with high psychological symptoms had increased constipation symptom severity and GI-specific anxiety in adults with CC. Future research should test whether these profiles predict differential treatment outcomes.
METHODS: Participants included adults presenting for anorectal manometry for CC (N = 468, 82% female, Mage = 47). Depression/anxiety symptoms and eating disorder (ED) symptoms (EAT-26) were used as indicators (i.e., variables used to derive profiles) representing unique psychological constructs. Constipation symptoms, GI-specific anxiety, BMI, and anorectal manometry results were used as validators (i.e., variables used to examine the clinical utility of the resulting profiles).
KEY RESULTS: A 5-profile solution provided the best statistical fit, comprising the following latent profiles (LPs): LP1 termed "high dieting, low bulimia;" LP2 termed "high ED symptoms;" LP3 termed "moderate ED symptoms;" LP4 termed "high anxiety and depression, low ED symptoms;" and LP5 termed "low psychological symptoms." The low psychological symptom profile (61% of the sample) had lower abdominal and overall constipation severity and lower GI-specific anxiety compared to the four profiles characterized by higher psychological symptoms (of any type). Profiles did not significantly differ on BMI or anorectal manometry results.
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Profiles with high psychological symptoms had increased constipation symptom severity and GI-specific anxiety in adults with CC. Future research should test whether these profiles predict differential treatment outcomes.