European radiology · 2020
Feasibility and reproducibility of T2 mapping and DWI for identifying malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ge Yu-Xi, Hu Shu-Dong, Wang Zi, Guan Rong-Ping, Zhou Xin-Yi, Gao Qi-Zhong, Yan Gen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value and reproducibility of T2 mapping versus apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) for identifying malignant lymph nodes in patients with non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2 mapping were performed on patients with suspected metastatic lymph nodes in the mesorectum or around the superior rectal artery with a short-axis diameter of 4-10 mm. The T2 and ADC values of pathology-confirmed metastatic versus non-metastatic lymph nodes were compared using the independent-samples t test and receiver operating characteristic curves. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were tested. The cutoff value for T2 relaxation time was determined.
RESULTS: In total, 67 lymph nodes underwent histological analysis, with 24 in the non-metastatic and 43 in the metastatic groups. Intra- and inter-observer agreements for T2 values were 0.999 and 0.998, respectively, which were higher than the ADC values of 0.924 and 0.844, respectively. The mean T2 and ADC values for metastatic lymph nodes (65 ± 7.8 ms and 1.17 ± 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively) were significantly lower than for benign lymph nodes(83 ± 5.7 ms and 1.29 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively). T2 values had a higher AUC value of 0.990 than the AUC value for ADC of 0.729. With a cutoff value of 77 ms, sensitivity and specificity for T2 values were 95% and 96%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: T2 mapping had higher diagnostic efficacy and reproducibility than ADC and may be useful in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
KEY POINTS: • Mean T2 values were significantly shorter for malignant versus benign LNs in patients with non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma. • The diagnostic efficacy and reproducibility of T2 values were excellent and superior to ADC values.
METHODS: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2 mapping were performed on patients with suspected metastatic lymph nodes in the mesorectum or around the superior rectal artery with a short-axis diameter of 4-10 mm. The T2 and ADC values of pathology-confirmed metastatic versus non-metastatic lymph nodes were compared using the independent-samples t test and receiver operating characteristic curves. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were tested. The cutoff value for T2 relaxation time was determined.
RESULTS: In total, 67 lymph nodes underwent histological analysis, with 24 in the non-metastatic and 43 in the metastatic groups. Intra- and inter-observer agreements for T2 values were 0.999 and 0.998, respectively, which were higher than the ADC values of 0.924 and 0.844, respectively. The mean T2 and ADC values for metastatic lymph nodes (65 ± 7.8 ms and 1.17 ± 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively) were significantly lower than for benign lymph nodes(83 ± 5.7 ms and 1.29 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively). T2 values had a higher AUC value of 0.990 than the AUC value for ADC of 0.729. With a cutoff value of 77 ms, sensitivity and specificity for T2 values were 95% and 96%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: T2 mapping had higher diagnostic efficacy and reproducibility than ADC and may be useful in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
KEY POINTS: • Mean T2 values were significantly shorter for malignant versus benign LNs in patients with non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma. • The diagnostic efficacy and reproducibility of T2 values were excellent and superior to ADC values.