Scientific reports · 2026
Artificial intelligence classification of rectal neoplasia by endoscopic fluorescence perfusion analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boland Patrick A, MacAonghusa Pol, Singaravelu Ashokkumar, McEntee Philip D, Cucek Jernej, Erzen Samo, Aigner Felix, Arezzo Alberto, Burke John P, Hompes Roel, Tuynman Jurriaan B, Neary Peter M, Cahill Ronan A
Аннотация
Disordered vascularity is a hallmark of carcinogenesis. Fluorescence microperfusion heterogeneity may discriminate malignant transformation within significant (> 20 mm) rectal polyps enabling in-situ endoscopic classification via machine learning (ML) methods to inform clinical care. Patients referred for transanal management of rectal neoplasia were recruited. Indocyanine green was administered intravenously and near-infrared (NIR) endoscopic video recorded. Videos were processed with bespoke fluorescence quantification software producing intensity-timeseries plots for neoplastic and normal regions of interest in the same patients. Plot features were extracted to train/test ML classification algorithms, including coefficient of variation (CV), reporting cancer characterisation sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. 190 video recordings from 182 patients (57.9% with cancer) from six cancer centres provided usable dataset (91% of 201 consenting patients). Overall, the software accurately tracked and detailed NIR perfusion features from, on average (SD), 74.7% (25.3) of annotated regions of interest over the five-minute recording phase. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy rates of traditional endoscopic biopsy (n = 172), MRI (n = 139) and expert surgeon opinion (n = 190) at surgery were 70.8%/100%/81.7%, 85.4%/ 44.1%/72.7% and 79.1%/80%/79.5% respectively. In comparison, trained ML sensitivity/specificity/ accuracy was 77.6%/39.8%/61.1% and 73.5%/48.2%/62.6% with base and CV featured algorithms respectively. Combining point of care clinical data (specifically MRI and clinicians’ preoperative predictions) with the ML algorithms improved sensitivity/specificity/accuracy to 86.0%/71.1%/79.5% and 82.2%/74.7%/79.0% respectively. Malignant transformation precipitates discriminant perfusion patterns, in a manner exploitable digitally, that indicate cancer presence in significant rectal polyps. Combining clinical indicators appears to improve classification accuracy further, especially specificity.Trial registration: Future of Colorectal Cancer Surgery (FOOCCuS1). Clinicatrials.gov. NCT04220242. Clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04220242. CLASSICA: Validating AI in Classifying Cancer in Real-Time Surgery. Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT05793554. Clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05793554.