MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000367958

Медицинская библиотека · Current problems in dermatology · 2014

Laser treatment and its implications for photodamaged skin and actinic keratosis.

de Vries Karin, Prens Errol P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Treatment of widespread actinic keratoses (AKs) and extensive photodamage is a challenge. One of the treatment options is laser therapy, whereby physicians have the option of using ablative lasers (CO2 and Erbium Yttrium Aluminium Garnet) or nonablative fractional laser systems. With ablative laser systems, the superficial layers of the skin are ablated, including epidermal and superficial dermal actinic damage. Re-epithelialization occurs from uninvolved skin and keratinocytes from follicles. When using a CO2 laser, additional cosmetic improvements are a result of removal and tightening of the photodamaged collagen in the superficial dermis. The most important risks of this treatment are scarring and dyspigmentation. These risks are lessened when using fractional lasers, which produce small columns of ablation or coagulation in the skin, leaving the surrounding skin intact. This treatment may be combined with topical agents. Existing evidence suggests that both ablative laser resurfacing and fractional laser treatments are effective in reducing AKs and photodamage. Although these treatment modalities are widely used and clinical experiences are positive, large comparative studies are remarkably scarce. Still, laser resurfacing has a place in the (field) treatment of widespread AKs and extensive photodamage.

Для цитирования: de Vries Karin, Prens Errol P. Laser treatment and its implications for photodamaged skin and actinic keratosis.. Current problems in dermatology. 2014. DOI: 10.1159/000367958.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.