The British journal of dermatology · 2014
Combination of ablative fractional laser and daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis in organ transplant recipients - a randomized controlled trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Togsverd-Bo K, Lei U, Erlendsson A M, Taudorf E H, Philipsen P A, Wulf H C, Skov L, Hædersdal M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) for actinic keratoses (AK) is hampered by pain during illumination and inferior efficacy in organ-transplant recipients (OTR).
OBJECTIVES: We assessed ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted daylight photodynamic therapy (PDT) (AFL-dPDT) compared with daylight PDT (dPDT), conventional PDT (cPDT) and AFL alone (AFL) in field treatment of AK in OTR.
METHODS: In each patient, four areas in the same region were randomized to one treatment with AFL-dPDT, dPDT, cPDT and AFL. AFL was delivered with a 2940-nm AFL at 2·3 mJ per pulse, 1·15 W, two stacks, 50-μs pulse-duration, 2·4% density. In dPDT and AFL-dPDT, methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) was applied for 2·5 h without occlusion during daylight exposure. For cPDT, MAL was occluded for 3 h followed by red-light (630 nm) irradiation at 37 J cm(-2). The primary end-point was complete response (CR) 3 months post-treatment.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients with 542 AK (grades I-III) in field-cancerized skin of the scalp, chest and extremities were treated during August and September 2012. After 3 months, CR (AK I-III) rates were 74% after AFL-dPDT, 46% after dPDT, 50% after cPDT and 5% after AFL (P < 0·001). CR rates in AFL-dPDT, dPDT and cPDT were also significantly different (P = 0·004). Median maximal pain scores differed significantly during AFL-dPDT (0), dPDT (0), AFL (0) and cPDT (5) (P < 0·001). Erythema and crusting were more intense following AFL-dPDT than dPDT and cPDT, but only transient hypopigmentation was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: AFL-dPDT is a novel PDT modality that enhances CR with excellent tolerability compared with dPDT and cPDT in difficult-to-treat AK in OTR.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted daylight photodynamic therapy (PDT) (AFL-dPDT) compared with daylight PDT (dPDT), conventional PDT (cPDT) and AFL alone (AFL) in field treatment of AK in OTR.
METHODS: In each patient, four areas in the same region were randomized to one treatment with AFL-dPDT, dPDT, cPDT and AFL. AFL was delivered with a 2940-nm AFL at 2·3 mJ per pulse, 1·15 W, two stacks, 50-μs pulse-duration, 2·4% density. In dPDT and AFL-dPDT, methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) was applied for 2·5 h without occlusion during daylight exposure. For cPDT, MAL was occluded for 3 h followed by red-light (630 nm) irradiation at 37 J cm(-2). The primary end-point was complete response (CR) 3 months post-treatment.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients with 542 AK (grades I-III) in field-cancerized skin of the scalp, chest and extremities were treated during August and September 2012. After 3 months, CR (AK I-III) rates were 74% after AFL-dPDT, 46% after dPDT, 50% after cPDT and 5% after AFL (P < 0·001). CR rates in AFL-dPDT, dPDT and cPDT were also significantly different (P = 0·004). Median maximal pain scores differed significantly during AFL-dPDT (0), dPDT (0), AFL (0) and cPDT (5) (P < 0·001). Erythema and crusting were more intense following AFL-dPDT than dPDT and cPDT, but only transient hypopigmentation was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: AFL-dPDT is a novel PDT modality that enhances CR with excellent tolerability compared with dPDT and cPDT in difficult-to-treat AK in OTR.