MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ajd.12158

Медицинская библиотека · The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2014

The efficacy and safety of topical 5% 5-fluorouracil in renal transplant recipients for the treatment of actinic keratoses.

Ingham Annabel I, Weightman Warren

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Actinic keratoses (AK) occur more commonly and behave more aggressively in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Topical 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cream is a commonly used agent whose efficacy and safety have never been exclusively studied in the RTR population before. Eight RTR were enrolled and 5% 5-FU cream applied to AK lesions on their face twice daily for 3 weeks. They were reviewed at 2 and 8 weeks, and 12 months post-commencement of treatment. Their AK were counted and their cumulative surface areas measured. Patients completed surveys monitoring adverse effects and tolerability. Complete (100%) and partial clearance (≥ 75%) rates were measured, as well as mean percentages of the reduction in AK surface area. Patients had complete clearance rates of 63 and 0% at 8 weeks and 12 months, respectively. All (100%) patients had partial clearance at week 8 and 71% had partial clearance at 12 months. Patients had on average 15 AK at week 0 and 1 and 3 at 8 weeks and 12 months, respectively. The mean AK clearance rate was 98% at week 8 and 79% at 12 months. Common side-effects were erythema, itch and flaking or scaling, mostly mild in severity. 5-FU appears to be an efficacious and safe treatment for AK in RTR.

Для цитирования: Ingham Annabel I, Weightman Warren. The efficacy and safety of topical 5% 5-fluorouracil in renal transplant recipients for the treatment of actinic keratoses.. The Australasian journal of dermatology. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12158.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.