Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2002
Nasolacrimal stents in the treatment of epiphora: long-term results.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Paúl Laura, Pinto Isabel, Vicente Jose Manuel, Armendariz Ana, Moreno Gema, Baraibar M Cruz
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Assessment of the long-term results achieved with use of nasolacrimal stents in the treatment of epiphora caused by obstruction of the lacrimal apparatus. The role of stents in treating this condition is evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1997 to April 1999, a total of 89 procedures to insert nasolacrimal stents were performed in 77 patients (20 men, 57 women; mean age, 53 years). A total of 79 stents were successfully implanted, with 10 failures (11.2%). Postprocedural course was followed for 16-38 months (mean, 27 mo) by means of clinical examinations and/or periodic dacryocystography, with removal of occluded stents. On conclusion of the study in September 2000, dacryocystography was performed in all patients in whom stents were still in place.
RESULTS: Of the 79 stents deployed, two were lost, two had to be excluded from the study, 45 (60%) ceased to function, and 30 (40%) remained patent. Median duration of stent patency of these 79 stents was 20 months. Mean time to occlusion was 9.2 months for all obstructed stents; 4.4 months for improperly placed stents (via a trajectory outside the normal lacrimal drainage apparatus) and 12.2 months for stents that appeared to have been inserted properly. Of the 45 occluded stents, 40 were removed and five were left in place. Upon removal, adherence of the stents to the lacrimal apparatus was frequently observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The low patency rate and the difficulties encountered in removing nasolacrimal stents during the course of long-term placement calls into question the efficacy of this method as a definitive treatment for epiphora caused by obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system, although studies comparing this and other treatment modalities are needed. Assessment of temporary stent placement may be in order.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1997 to April 1999, a total of 89 procedures to insert nasolacrimal stents were performed in 77 patients (20 men, 57 women; mean age, 53 years). A total of 79 stents were successfully implanted, with 10 failures (11.2%). Postprocedural course was followed for 16-38 months (mean, 27 mo) by means of clinical examinations and/or periodic dacryocystography, with removal of occluded stents. On conclusion of the study in September 2000, dacryocystography was performed in all patients in whom stents were still in place.
RESULTS: Of the 79 stents deployed, two were lost, two had to be excluded from the study, 45 (60%) ceased to function, and 30 (40%) remained patent. Median duration of stent patency of these 79 stents was 20 months. Mean time to occlusion was 9.2 months for all obstructed stents; 4.4 months for improperly placed stents (via a trajectory outside the normal lacrimal drainage apparatus) and 12.2 months for stents that appeared to have been inserted properly. Of the 45 occluded stents, 40 were removed and five were left in place. Upon removal, adherence of the stents to the lacrimal apparatus was frequently observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The low patency rate and the difficulties encountered in removing nasolacrimal stents during the course of long-term placement calls into question the efficacy of this method as a definitive treatment for epiphora caused by obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system, although studies comparing this and other treatment modalities are needed. Assessment of temporary stent placement may be in order.