International ophthalmology · 2022
Demographic, clinical and tomographic characteristics of pellucid marginal degeneration patients in South Egyptian population.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mounir Amr, Abdellah Marwa Mahmoud, Awny Islam, Aldghaimy Ahmed Hassan, Mostafa Engy Mohamed
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the demographic, clinical, and tomographic characteristics of pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) patients in South Egypt.
METHODS: This study was retrospective cross-sectional, including all patients who attended and sought refractive surgery at Sohag Center for Corneal and Refractive Surgeries, Sohag, South Egypt, between October 2016 and October 2020, and had a diagnosis of PMD. It included cases of PMD at different stages. Cases with PMD were diagnosed by the two authors (experienced in corneal refractive surgery), combining both slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings and corneal tomography.
RESULTS: Out of the 2534 patients attending the Sohag Center for Corneal and Refractive Surgeries (between October 2016 and May 2020) seeking correction of their refractive errors, 24 patients were found to fit in the diagnosis of PMD. Forty-three eyes of the 24 patients were diagnosed with PMD. The topographic patterns ranged from horizontal bow tie (against the rule astigmatism) being the least presenting, followed by crab claw, then butterfly pattern.
CONCLUSION: PMD is a separate entity of the ectatic corneal spectrum that can easily be misinterpreted as Keratoconus. Topographic and tomographic patterns cannot solely diagnose PMD as they should be enforced by slit-lamp findings.
METHODS: This study was retrospective cross-sectional, including all patients who attended and sought refractive surgery at Sohag Center for Corneal and Refractive Surgeries, Sohag, South Egypt, between October 2016 and October 2020, and had a diagnosis of PMD. It included cases of PMD at different stages. Cases with PMD were diagnosed by the two authors (experienced in corneal refractive surgery), combining both slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings and corneal tomography.
RESULTS: Out of the 2534 patients attending the Sohag Center for Corneal and Refractive Surgeries (between October 2016 and May 2020) seeking correction of their refractive errors, 24 patients were found to fit in the diagnosis of PMD. Forty-three eyes of the 24 patients were diagnosed with PMD. The topographic patterns ranged from horizontal bow tie (against the rule astigmatism) being the least presenting, followed by crab claw, then butterfly pattern.
CONCLUSION: PMD is a separate entity of the ectatic corneal spectrum that can easily be misinterpreted as Keratoconus. Topographic and tomographic patterns cannot solely diagnose PMD as they should be enforced by slit-lamp findings.