Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2022
Prevalence of Corneal Topographic Patterns in Ectatic Corneal Diseases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shah Zalak, Singh Shwetambari, Shilpy Neha, Purohit Dipali
Аннотация
SIGNIFICANCE: The article highlights various topographic patterns and their prevalence in a large spectrum of ectatic corneal diseases (ECDs). Knowledge of these patterns can help clinicians for quicker diagnosis and selection of appropriate contact lens design.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine various corneal topography patterns and their prevalence in patients with ECDs who visited a tertiary eye hospital in western India.
METHODS: Keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, keratoglobus, and post-refractive surgery progressive corneal ectasia are considered under ECDs. This cross-sectional retrospective study reviewed records of 632 consecutive patients with clinical ECDs at their first presentation. The right eye was considered for pattern analysis. In cases with suspected or forme fruste ectasia in the right eye, the fellow eye was considered. A sagittal map with standard scale of Atlas 9000 topographer (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was used for pattern analysis. They were classified into 18 categories and grouped under five groups. The prevalence of these patterns was calculated and assessed with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of patients was 23.6 ± 8.2 years. The highest prevalence was of asymmetric patterns (39.6% [95% CI, 35.7 to 43.5%]; asymmetric bowtie [AB] with steepest radial axis index [SRAX], 18.8%; AB with inferior steep, 16.0%; AB with superior steep [SS], 3.2%; symmetric bowtie with SRAX, 1.6%) and of central or paracentral patterns (28.6% [95% CI, 25.1 to 32.3%]; inferior steep, 12.2%; heart, 7.4%; oval, 4.1%; symmetric bowtie, 2.4%; round, 1.6%; irregular, 0.9%) followed by advanced patterns (17.3% [95% CI, 14.4 to 20.4%; nonmeasurable, 5.4%; globus, 4.9%; indiscriminate, 7.0%). The peripheral patterns were 11.7% (95% CI, 9.3 to 14.4%) (claw, 6.3%; junctional, 3.2%; butterfly, 1.9%; SS, 0.3%). Rare patterns were 2.8% (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.5%) (superior [junctional, claw, and heart], AB with SS with SRAX, and AB with SRAX located temporally).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric and central or paracentral are the most common patterns in our study. The higher prevalence of advanced patterns indicates the need for earlier diagnosis of ECDs in our population. The peripheral patterns also have significant prevalence.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine various corneal topography patterns and their prevalence in patients with ECDs who visited a tertiary eye hospital in western India.
METHODS: Keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, keratoglobus, and post-refractive surgery progressive corneal ectasia are considered under ECDs. This cross-sectional retrospective study reviewed records of 632 consecutive patients with clinical ECDs at their first presentation. The right eye was considered for pattern analysis. In cases with suspected or forme fruste ectasia in the right eye, the fellow eye was considered. A sagittal map with standard scale of Atlas 9000 topographer (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was used for pattern analysis. They were classified into 18 categories and grouped under five groups. The prevalence of these patterns was calculated and assessed with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of patients was 23.6 ± 8.2 years. The highest prevalence was of asymmetric patterns (39.6% [95% CI, 35.7 to 43.5%]; asymmetric bowtie [AB] with steepest radial axis index [SRAX], 18.8%; AB with inferior steep, 16.0%; AB with superior steep [SS], 3.2%; symmetric bowtie with SRAX, 1.6%) and of central or paracentral patterns (28.6% [95% CI, 25.1 to 32.3%]; inferior steep, 12.2%; heart, 7.4%; oval, 4.1%; symmetric bowtie, 2.4%; round, 1.6%; irregular, 0.9%) followed by advanced patterns (17.3% [95% CI, 14.4 to 20.4%; nonmeasurable, 5.4%; globus, 4.9%; indiscriminate, 7.0%). The peripheral patterns were 11.7% (95% CI, 9.3 to 14.4%) (claw, 6.3%; junctional, 3.2%; butterfly, 1.9%; SS, 0.3%). Rare patterns were 2.8% (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.5%) (superior [junctional, claw, and heart], AB with SS with SRAX, and AB with SRAX located temporally).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric and central or paracentral are the most common patterns in our study. The higher prevalence of advanced patterns indicates the need for earlier diagnosis of ECDs in our population. The peripheral patterns also have significant prevalence.