Cutaneous and ocular toxicology · 2026
Demodex parasite density in patients with melasma: a case-control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baran Fatma Bengisu, Altunisik Nihal, Turkmen Dursun, Kanat Zekiye, Sener Serpil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although multiple factors contribute to the development of melasma, there are reports suggesting a potential role of Demodex parasites in hyperpigmentation. This study aimed to compare the density and prevalence of Demodex infestation between patients with melasma and healthy controls.
METHODS: This case-control study included 35 melasma patients and 35 healthy volunteers. Standard superficial skin biopsies using cyanoacrylate adhesive were taken from the malar regions. Samples were examined via light microscopy, with a density of ≥5 Demodex/cm2 defined as positive.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the melasma and control groups in terms of Demodex mite density or positivity rates. Correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between mMASI scores and Demodex mite density. As a secondary finding, the mean mMASI score was significantly higher in male participants compared to female participants.
CONCLUSION: In this case-control study, we found no statistically significant association between Demodex parasite density and melasma in our study population. While our findings do not support an association in this sample, future large-scale and multicenter studies could further explore the potential role of Demodex in skin disorders that have been suggested by other reports. The single-center design and moderate sample size should be considered when interpreting these results.
METHODS: This case-control study included 35 melasma patients and 35 healthy volunteers. Standard superficial skin biopsies using cyanoacrylate adhesive were taken from the malar regions. Samples were examined via light microscopy, with a density of ≥5 Demodex/cm2 defined as positive.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the melasma and control groups in terms of Demodex mite density or positivity rates. Correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between mMASI scores and Demodex mite density. As a secondary finding, the mean mMASI score was significantly higher in male participants compared to female participants.
CONCLUSION: In this case-control study, we found no statistically significant association between Demodex parasite density and melasma in our study population. While our findings do not support an association in this sample, future large-scale and multicenter studies could further explore the potential role of Demodex in skin disorders that have been suggested by other reports. The single-center design and moderate sample size should be considered when interpreting these results.