Journal of hypertension · 2019
Association between invasively measured aortic pulse pressure and orthostatic hypotension in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chung Jaehoon, Kim Hack-Lyoung, Lim Woo-Hyun, Seo Jae-Bin, Kim Sang-Hyun, Zo Joo-Hee, Kim Myung-A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Underlying pathophysiology of orthostatic hypotension has been poorly understood. We hypothesized that aortic pulse pressure (APP) reflecting aortic stiffness may be involved in the development of orthostatic hypotension.
METHODS: A total of 200 patients (age 64.3 ± 10.9 years, 62.5% men) who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively recruited. Orthostatic hypotension was defined as SBP drop at least 20 mmHg or DBP drop at least 10 mmHg within 3 min of the standing position compared with the supine position. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at the ascending aorta using a pig-tail catheter immediately before ICA. APP was calculated as a difference between the aortic peak systolic pressure and the end-diastolic pressure.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (78.0%) had obstructive coronary artery disease on ICA. Orthostatic hypotension was present in 58 patients (29.0%). Diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in patients with orthostatic hypotension than those without (48.3% vs. 23.2%; P < 0.001). Other clinical parameters including age, cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory findings and concomitant medications were not different between patients with and without orthostatic hypotension (P > 0.05 for each). In hemodynamic parameters, APP was higher in patients with orthostatic hypotension than those without (78.4 ± 25.8 vs. 68.3 ± 21.3 mmHg; P = 0.005). Higher APP was significantly associated with the presence of orthostatic hypotension even after controlling for potential confounders (odds ratio, 2.99; 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.78; P = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing ICA, APP was associated with increased risk of orthostatic hypotension. Central aortic stiffness may play a role in the development of orthostatic hypotension.
METHODS: A total of 200 patients (age 64.3 ± 10.9 years, 62.5% men) who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively recruited. Orthostatic hypotension was defined as SBP drop at least 20 mmHg or DBP drop at least 10 mmHg within 3 min of the standing position compared with the supine position. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at the ascending aorta using a pig-tail catheter immediately before ICA. APP was calculated as a difference between the aortic peak systolic pressure and the end-diastolic pressure.
RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (78.0%) had obstructive coronary artery disease on ICA. Orthostatic hypotension was present in 58 patients (29.0%). Diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in patients with orthostatic hypotension than those without (48.3% vs. 23.2%; P < 0.001). Other clinical parameters including age, cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory findings and concomitant medications were not different between patients with and without orthostatic hypotension (P > 0.05 for each). In hemodynamic parameters, APP was higher in patients with orthostatic hypotension than those without (78.4 ± 25.8 vs. 68.3 ± 21.3 mmHg; P = 0.005). Higher APP was significantly associated with the presence of orthostatic hypotension even after controlling for potential confounders (odds ratio, 2.99; 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.78; P = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing ICA, APP was associated with increased risk of orthostatic hypotension. Central aortic stiffness may play a role in the development of orthostatic hypotension.