Academic radiology · 2025
Advanced Automated Model for Robust Bone Marrow Segmentation in Whole-body MRI.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bauer Fabian, Kächele Jessica, Bernhard Juliane, Hajiyianni Marina, Weinhold Niels, Sauer Sandra, Grözinger Martin, Raab Marc-Steffen, Mai Elias K, Weber Tim F, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Schlemmer Heinz-Peter, Maier-Hein Klaus, Delorme Stefan, Neher Peter, Wennmann Markus
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To establish an advanced automated bone marrow (BM) segmentation model on whole-body (WB-)MRI in monoclonal plasma cell disorders (MPCD), and to demonstrate its robust performance on multicenter datasets with severe myeloma-related pathologies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised multi-vendor, multi-protocol imaging data acquired with varying field strength across 8 different centers. In total, 210 WB-MRIs of 207 MPCD patients were included. An nnU-Net algorithm was established for segmenting the individual bone marrow spaces (BMS) of the spine, pelvis, humeri and femora (advanced segmentation model). For this task, 186 T1-weighted (T1w) WB-MRIs from center 1 were used in the training set. Test sets included 12 T1w WB-MRIs from center 2 (I) and 9 T1w WB-MRIs from centers 3-8 (II). Example cases were included to showcase segmentation performance on T1w WB-MRIs with extensive tumor load. The segmentation accuracy of the advanced segmentation model was compared to a prior established basic segmentation model by calculating Dice scores and using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: The mean Dice score on the individual BMS was 0.89±0.13 (test set I) and 0.88±0.11 (test set II), significantly higher than the Dice scores of a prior basic model (p<0.05). Dice scores for the BMS of the individual bones ranged from 0.77 to 0.96 (test set I), and 0.81 to 0.95 (test set II). BM altered by myeloma-relevant pathologies, artifacts or low imaging quality was precisely segmented.
CONCLUSION: The advanced model performed reliable, automated segmentations, even on heterogeneously acquired multicenter WB-MRIs with severe pathologies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort comprised multi-vendor, multi-protocol imaging data acquired with varying field strength across 8 different centers. In total, 210 WB-MRIs of 207 MPCD patients were included. An nnU-Net algorithm was established for segmenting the individual bone marrow spaces (BMS) of the spine, pelvis, humeri and femora (advanced segmentation model). For this task, 186 T1-weighted (T1w) WB-MRIs from center 1 were used in the training set. Test sets included 12 T1w WB-MRIs from center 2 (I) and 9 T1w WB-MRIs from centers 3-8 (II). Example cases were included to showcase segmentation performance on T1w WB-MRIs with extensive tumor load. The segmentation accuracy of the advanced segmentation model was compared to a prior established basic segmentation model by calculating Dice scores and using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: The mean Dice score on the individual BMS was 0.89±0.13 (test set I) and 0.88±0.11 (test set II), significantly higher than the Dice scores of a prior basic model (p<0.05). Dice scores for the BMS of the individual bones ranged from 0.77 to 0.96 (test set I), and 0.81 to 0.95 (test set II). BM altered by myeloma-relevant pathologies, artifacts or low imaging quality was precisely segmented.
CONCLUSION: The advanced model performed reliable, automated segmentations, even on heterogeneously acquired multicenter WB-MRIs with severe pathologies.