Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Socioeconomic Impact, Equity, and Sustainability in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: A Structured Narrative Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chiari Francesco, Ferlito Salvatore, Piccione Guglielmo, Modica Rodolfo, Lentini Mario, Botto Giancarlo Carmelo, Maira Salvatore, Kedous Skander, Chiesa-Estomba Carlos, Guarino Pierre, Lechien Jerome Rene, Maniaci Antonino
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sustainable head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery is challenged by environmental impact, workforce shortages, inequitable access to advanced techniques, and policy constraints. Addressing these areas is critical for equitable, high-quality care.
METHODS: This structured narrative review synthesizes evidence on environmental sustainability, workforce development, technological innovation, health policy, and socioeconomic determinants in HNC surgery, without aiming to provide a systematic or exhaustive evidence synthesis. Sources included peer-reviewed literature, global workforce surveys, and international policy reports, with a focus on disparities between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
RESULTS: Operating rooms produce up to 70% of hospital solid waste and consume 3-6 times more energy than other units; reusable instruments and improved waste segregation can reduce carbon footprints by over 50%. Workforce shortages are severe in LMICs, where subspecialty training is scarce; global partnerships, bidirectional education, and simulation-based learning can expand local capacity. Telemedicine, artificial intelligence, and three-dimensional printing enhance surgical planning, training, and access but may widen disparities without equitable deployment. Policy tools-including diagnosis-related groups, bundled payments, and universal coverage-affect access and innovation uptake. Pandemic preparedness underscores the value of resilient systems with flexible staffing and telehealth integration.
CONCLUSIONS: HNC surgery requires coordinated action across environmental, workforce, technological, socioeconomic, and policy domains; however, future systematic reviews are needed to comprehensively map the evidence base and assess its methodological quality. Embedding sustainability in clinical practice, ensuring equitable innovation access, and aligning reimbursement with high-value care can strengthen system resilience, improve outcomes, and support long-term surgical service viability.
METHODS: This structured narrative review synthesizes evidence on environmental sustainability, workforce development, technological innovation, health policy, and socioeconomic determinants in HNC surgery, without aiming to provide a systematic or exhaustive evidence synthesis. Sources included peer-reviewed literature, global workforce surveys, and international policy reports, with a focus on disparities between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
RESULTS: Operating rooms produce up to 70% of hospital solid waste and consume 3-6 times more energy than other units; reusable instruments and improved waste segregation can reduce carbon footprints by over 50%. Workforce shortages are severe in LMICs, where subspecialty training is scarce; global partnerships, bidirectional education, and simulation-based learning can expand local capacity. Telemedicine, artificial intelligence, and three-dimensional printing enhance surgical planning, training, and access but may widen disparities without equitable deployment. Policy tools-including diagnosis-related groups, bundled payments, and universal coverage-affect access and innovation uptake. Pandemic preparedness underscores the value of resilient systems with flexible staffing and telehealth integration.
CONCLUSIONS: HNC surgery requires coordinated action across environmental, workforce, technological, socioeconomic, and policy domains; however, future systematic reviews are needed to comprehensively map the evidence base and assess its methodological quality. Embedding sustainability in clinical practice, ensuring equitable innovation access, and aligning reimbursement with high-value care can strengthen system resilience, improve outcomes, and support long-term surgical service viability.