m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2024

VCd versus VRd in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Matched Real-World Analysis from the Balkan Myeloma Study Group (BMSG).

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Kastritis Efstathios, Beksac Meral, Badelita Sorina Nicoleta, Katodritou Eirini, Bila Jelena, Spanoudakis Emmanouil, Seval Guldane Cengiz, Cvetkovic Zorica, Markovic Olivera, Toprak Selami Koçak, Dalampira Dimitra, Coriu Daniel, Bezirgiannidou Zoi, Pirsic Mario, Valkovic Toni, Ursuleac Iulia, Sretenovic Aleksandra, Sevastoudi Angeliki, Batinic Josip, Barbu Sinziana, Roussou Maria, Gavriatopoulou Maria, Terpos Evangelos, Dimopoulos Meletios A, Balkan Myeloma Study Group

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide (VCd) remains a popular regimen, due to its activity and low toxicity, while bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is widely used in US and Europe; both are combined with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies but VCd and VRd have not been compared directly in adequately powered prospective trials.

AIM: We compared the outcomes of 1216 patients treated with VCd (N = 690) or VRd (N = 526) in a real-world setting.

RESULTS: Patients treated with VCd had more often severe renal dysfunction, ISS-3 disease, hypercalcemia, elevated LDH, anemia, thrombocytopenia, poor performance while VRd-treated were older and received less often autologous transplant but more frequently maintenance but the duration of induction was similar. VRd was associated with substantially higher overall response and CR/VGPR rates to induction(P < .001) and improved PFS and OS in univariate analysis, especially among patients with standard risk disease, without renal dysfunction and in the elderly; however, in multivariate analysis there was no significant difference in either PFS or OS. In patients strictly matched 1:1 for major prognostic variables (188 in each group, total N = 376), the superiority of VRd in terms of responses rates and depth of response was confirmed, but without significant PFS or OS difference.

CONCLUSION: VRd is a more active induction regimen than VCd, although use of maintenance with lenalidomide may dilute the PFS or OS benefit. VCd induction remains an option in special circumstances. With the implementation of monoclonal antibodies, VCd backbone can be considered for patients without access to or who do not tolerate VRd.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты