Interferon Regulatory Factor 4: An Alternative Marker for Plasma Cells in Daratumumab-Treated Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Anti-CD38 therapeutic modalities (e.g., daratumumab) can impede classical CD38 and CD138 gating use for plasma cell (PC) detection in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with minimal residual disease (MRD). We assessed the applicability of CD229, CD269, and interferon regulatory factor (IRF-4) for PC detection in MM MRD patients.
METHODS
Bone marrow samples were collected from patients with MM. Through multiparameter flow cytometry, we evaluated the suitability of CD229, CD269, and IRF-4 for distinguishing PCs from other hematopoietic cells and compared their expression pattern on normal PCs (nPCs) and aberrant PCs (aPCs). We also assessed IRF-4 expression stability after sample storage under different conditions. A 10-color MRD antibody panel was used to determine whether IRF-4 is an alternative primary PC-gating marker for MM MRD assessment.
RESULTS
IRF-4 was expressed specifically on all PCs; its mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was highest on PCs among all hematopoietic cells. This MFI did not decrease even after sample storage at 4°C or 25°C for 72 h. In all 42 MRD assessment samples, except for samples (n = 10) with no PCs, the use of IRF-4 enabled accurate nPC (n = 12), aPC (n = 13), and nPC + aPC (n = 7) identification. Even samples from daratumumab-treated patients had high IRF-4 MFI, with no difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment (n = 7; p = 0.610).
CONCLUSIONS
IRF-4 demonstrates high MFI on PCs, and it is not expressed on other leukocytes. In MM patients with MRD, daratumumab treatment does not affect IRF-4 expression. IRF-4 is a promising marker for PC identification in MRD assessment of MM patients undergoing anti-CD38 therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.