DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.013
Effect of Different Viscosities on Pharyngeal Pressure During Swallowing: A Study Using High-Resolution Manometry.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To investigate and compare the mechanism of swallowing with respect to the viscosity of ingested material between patients with and without dysphagia.
DESIGN
Prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed clinical study.
SETTING
General teaching hospital, rehabilitation unit.
PARTICIPANTS
We retrospectively reviewed the high-resolution manometry (HRM) results of 35 patients with dysphagia symptoms (N=35). Additionally, we included 18 patients without dysphagia. Based on videofluoroscopic swallowing study results, we classified the patients into 2 groups: one with aspiration and the other without aspiration.
INTERVENTION: Swallowing of a 5-mL thin liquid and 5-mL honey-like liquid in all patients.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: HRM of various variables during the swallowing process.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference between the thin liquid and honey-like liquid with respect to parameters for HRM in the patients without dysphagia and in the nonaspiration and aspiration groups. However, in a comparison between thin liquid and honey-like liquid with respect to visuospatial and timing variables, the degree of differences in the maximal pressure of the velopharynx in the aspiration group was significantly larger than the patients without dysphagia and the nonaspiration group (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that there is a clear difference in the degree of adaptation to viscosity between the 3 groups-patients without dysphagia, patients with aspiration, and patients without aspiration. These differences may provide an explanation for the mechanism of swallowing, which may be useful for the treatment of dysphagia.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.