Heliyon · 2024
Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitor-dependent maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma a systematic review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Xin-Xin, Yao Guoli, Yang Yujing, Han Yahui, Yang Lin, Zhang Yuefeng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Even with significant advancements, treating multiple myeloma (MM) remains difficult. At present, the main treatment methods include combined treatment of stem cell transplantation, drug treatment, etc. With the clarification of the molecular biological mechanism of MM, as well as the in-depth study of the internal signal of myeloma cells and the microenvironment of MM patients, more and more new drugs targeting myeloma and microenvironment are gradually used in clinical maintenance treatment, such as inhibit the proteosome: ixazomib, bortezomib and carfilzomib, immune - modulators: thalidomide and lenalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, etc. have made great progress in MM maintenance treatment. With the continuous development of proteasome inhibitor maintenance treatment in MM, the prognosis of the disease has been significantly improved. Our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse reactions of proteasome inhibitors in maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma, providing new ideas for clinical medication.
METHODS: Four databases containing randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitors in the maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma are retrieved by the computer. Once the quality of the literature has been thoroughly evaluated, run the data via the RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS: Eventually 8 studies were added in this systematic review. Compared with the placebo group, proteasome inhibitor in maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma patients with prolonged the survival without progression and overall existence. 5 studies reported the peripheral neuropathy of multiple myeloma in the treatment group compared to placebo group, which was remarkably greater (OR: 1.98; 95 % Cl: 1.35, 2.92; P < 0.001) compared to placebo group, Serious adverse events (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01), Rash (OR: 2.23; 95 % Cl: 1.62, 3.05; P < 0.001) and Vomiting (OR: 5.12; 95 % Cl: 3.36, 7.80; P < 0.001). The Serious adverse events of the treatment group were remarkably greater compared with the untreated group (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The study results proposed that proteasome inhibitors are effective in the multiple myeloma maintenance treatment compared with the placebo group. Bortezomib has certain advantages in prolonging PFS, followed by ixazomib and carfilzomib in terms of efficacy. Bortezombib may be superior to carfilzombib in extending OS. However, the adverse reactions caused by proteasome inhibitors, such as Peripheral neuropathy, Serious adverse events, Rash, Vomiting, etc., should be paid enough attention.
METHODS: Four databases containing randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitors in the maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma are retrieved by the computer. Once the quality of the literature has been thoroughly evaluated, run the data via the RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS: Eventually 8 studies were added in this systematic review. Compared with the placebo group, proteasome inhibitor in maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma patients with prolonged the survival without progression and overall existence. 5 studies reported the peripheral neuropathy of multiple myeloma in the treatment group compared to placebo group, which was remarkably greater (OR: 1.98; 95 % Cl: 1.35, 2.92; P < 0.001) compared to placebo group, Serious adverse events (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01), Rash (OR: 2.23; 95 % Cl: 1.62, 3.05; P < 0.001) and Vomiting (OR: 5.12; 95 % Cl: 3.36, 7.80; P < 0.001). The Serious adverse events of the treatment group were remarkably greater compared with the untreated group (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The study results proposed that proteasome inhibitors are effective in the multiple myeloma maintenance treatment compared with the placebo group. Bortezomib has certain advantages in prolonging PFS, followed by ixazomib and carfilzomib in terms of efficacy. Bortezombib may be superior to carfilzombib in extending OS. However, the adverse reactions caused by proteasome inhibitors, such as Peripheral neuropathy, Serious adverse events, Rash, Vomiting, etc., should be paid enough attention.