MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2400712

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2024

Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.

Facon Thierry, Dimopoulos Meletios-Athanasios, Leleu Xavier P, Beksac Meral, Pour Ludek, Hájek Roman, Liu Zhuogang, Minarik Jiri, Moreau Philippe, Romejko-Jarosinska Joanna, Spicka Ivan, Vorobyev Vladimir I, Besemer Britta, Ishida Tadao, Janowski Wojciech, Kalayoglu-Besisik Sevgi, Parmar Gurdeep, Robak Pawel, Zamagni Elena, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Martin Thomas G, Manier Salomon, Mohty Mohamad, Oprea Corina, Brégeault Marie-France, Macé Sandrine, Berthou Christelle, Bregman David, Klippel Zandra, Orlowski Robert Z, IMROZ Study Group

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is a preferred first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Whether the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab to the VRd regimen would reduce the risk of disease progression or death among patients ineligible to undergo transplantation is unclear.

METHODS

In an international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 3:2 ratio, patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation to receive either isatuximab plus VRd or VRd alone. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points included a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status in patients with a complete response.

RESULTS

A total of 446 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 59.7 months, the estimated progression-free survival at 60 months was 63.2% in the isatuximab-VRd group, as compared with 45.2% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.60; 98.5% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was significantly higher in the isatuximab-VRd group than in the VRd group (74.7% vs. 64.1%, P = 0.01), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status and a complete response (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.003). No new safety signals were observed with the isatuximab-VRd regimen. The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment and the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Isatuximab-VRd was more effective than VRd as initial therapy in patients 18 to 80 years of age with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible to undergo transplantation. (Funded by Sanofi and a Cancer Center Support Grant; IMROZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03319667.).

Для цитирования: Facon Thierry, Dimopoulos Meletios-Athanasios, Leleu Xavier P, Beksac Meral, Pour Ludek, Hájek Roman, Liu Zhuogang, Minarik Jiri, Moreau Philippe, Romejko-Jarosinska Joanna, Spicka Ivan, Vorobyev Vladimir I, Besemer Britta, Ishida Tadao, Janowski Wojciech, Kalayoglu-Besisik Sevgi, Parmar Gurdeep, Robak Pawel, Zamagni Elena, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Martin Thomas G, Manier Salomon, Mohty Mohamad, Oprea Corina, Brégeault Marie-France, Macé Sandrine, Berthou Christelle, Bregman David, Klippel Zandra, Orlowski Robert Z, IMROZ Study Group. Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.. The New England journal of medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2400712.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.