Effectiveness and safety of a novel crosslinked hyaluronate canalicular gel occlusive device for dry eye.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a crosslinked hyaluronate (HA) canalicular filler (Lacrifill Canalicular Gel) compared with a commercially available hydrogel canalicular plug (Form Fit).

SETTING

5 sites in the United States.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, controlled, double-masked, randomized 2:1 (filler:plug).

METHODS

Adults (≥22 years) with the Schirmer test (with anesthesia) ≤10 mm/5 minutes, presence of corneal staining, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) of ≥23 with ≤3 responses of "not applicable," patent lacrimal drainage system, and bilateral corrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Filler or plugs were instilled bilaterally in the inferior canaliculi. Primary effectiveness endpoint was noninferiority of the mean within subject change from baseline to month 3 in Schirmer score for patients receiving filler compared with plugs. The key secondary effectiveness endpoint was noninferiority of the proportion of patients with filler achieving improvement from baseline to month 3 in OSDI by a minimal clinically important difference. Additional endpoints included the mean change from baseline to 3 and 6 months in tear meniscus height, OSDI, corneal staining, tear breakup time, and safety.

RESULTS

157 patients were randomized; 99 patients with crosslinked HA filler and 52 patients with hydrogel plugs completed the study. Filler was noninferior to plugs in the mean Schirmer score change from baseline and in the proportion of patients achieving a clinically important improvement in OSDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Crosslinked HA filler is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective method to treat dry eye. Clinically and statistically significant improvements in signs and symptoms of dry eye were sustained through 6 months.