Gastroenterology · 2002
The value of serologic markers in indeterminate colitis: a prospective follow-up study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Joossens Sofie, Reinisch Walter, Vermeire Séverine, Sendid Boualem, Poulain Daniel, Peeters Marc, Geboes Karel, Bossuyt Xavier, Vandewalle Peggy, Oberhuber Georg, Vogelsang Harald, Rutgeerts Paul, Colombel Jean-Frédéric
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In the absence of pathognomonic markers for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease depends on a compendium of clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and histologic criteria that bears imperfect specificity to the individual disorders. In 10% of cases of colitis, no differentiation can be made between CD and UC; these patients are diagnosed with indeterminate colitis (IC). We evaluated the value of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) to increase diagnostic accuracy in categorizing IC.
METHODS: Since 1996, 97 patients with IC from 3 centers (Leuven, Lille, and Vienna) were enrolled, analyzed for pANCA and ASCA, and followed up prospectively.
RESULTS: A definitive diagnosis has been reached for 31 of 97 patients (32%). In these patients, ASCA+/pANCA- correlated with CD in 8 of 10 patients, whereas ASCA-/pANCA+ correlated with UC in 7 of 11 patients. The remaining 4 cases became CD, clinically behaving as UC-like CD. Almost half of the patients (47 of 97 [48.5%]) were negative for ASCA and pANCA, and 40 remain diagnosed with IC to date. Only 7 seronegative cases (14.9%) became CD or UC compared with 48% (24 of 50) of seropositive patients (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Results so far show that ASCA+/pANCA- predicts CD in 80% of patients with IC and ASCA-/pANCA+ predicts UC in 63.6%. Interestingly, 48.5% of patients do not show antibodies against ASCA or pANCA. Most of these patients remain diagnosed with IC during their further clinical course, perhaps reflecting a distinct clinicoserological entity.
METHODS: Since 1996, 97 patients with IC from 3 centers (Leuven, Lille, and Vienna) were enrolled, analyzed for pANCA and ASCA, and followed up prospectively.
RESULTS: A definitive diagnosis has been reached for 31 of 97 patients (32%). In these patients, ASCA+/pANCA- correlated with CD in 8 of 10 patients, whereas ASCA-/pANCA+ correlated with UC in 7 of 11 patients. The remaining 4 cases became CD, clinically behaving as UC-like CD. Almost half of the patients (47 of 97 [48.5%]) were negative for ASCA and pANCA, and 40 remain diagnosed with IC to date. Only 7 seronegative cases (14.9%) became CD or UC compared with 48% (24 of 50) of seropositive patients (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Results so far show that ASCA+/pANCA- predicts CD in 80% of patients with IC and ASCA-/pANCA+ predicts UC in 63.6%. Interestingly, 48.5% of patients do not show antibodies against ASCA or pANCA. Most of these patients remain diagnosed with IC during their further clinical course, perhaps reflecting a distinct clinicoserological entity.