Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
Assessing facial weakness in myasthenia gravis with facial recognition software and deep learning.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ruiter Annabel M, Wang Ziqi, Yin Zhao, Naber Willemijn C, Simons Jerrel, Blom Jurre T, van Gemert Jan C, Verschuuren Jan J G M, Tannemaat Martijn R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease leading to fatigable muscle weakness. Extra-ocular and bulbar muscles are most commonly affected. We aimed to investigate whether facial weakness can be quantified automatically and used for diagnosis and disease monitoring.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed video recordings of 70 MG patients and 69 healthy controls (HC) with two different methods. Facial weakness was first quantified with facial expression recognition software. Subsequently, a deep learning (DL) computer model was trained for the classification of diagnosis and disease severity using multiple cross-validations on videos of 50 patients and 50 controls. Results were validated using unseen videos of 20 MG patients and 19 HC.
RESULTS: Expression of anger (p = 0.026), fear (p = 0.003), and happiness (p < 0.001) was significantly decreased in MG compared to HC. Specific patterns of decreased facial movement were detectable in each emotion. Results of the DL model for diagnosis were as follows: area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator curve 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85), sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.76, and accuracy 76%. For disease severity: AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90), sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.63, and accuracy 80%. Results of validation, diagnosis: AUC 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67-0.97), sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.74, and accuracy 87%. For disease severity: AUC 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67-1.0), sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.86, and accuracy 94%.
INTERPRETATION: Patterns of facial weakness can be detected with facial recognition software. Second, this study delivers a 'proof of concept' for a DL model that can distinguish MG from HC and classifies disease severity.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed video recordings of 70 MG patients and 69 healthy controls (HC) with two different methods. Facial weakness was first quantified with facial expression recognition software. Subsequently, a deep learning (DL) computer model was trained for the classification of diagnosis and disease severity using multiple cross-validations on videos of 50 patients and 50 controls. Results were validated using unseen videos of 20 MG patients and 19 HC.
RESULTS: Expression of anger (p = 0.026), fear (p = 0.003), and happiness (p < 0.001) was significantly decreased in MG compared to HC. Specific patterns of decreased facial movement were detectable in each emotion. Results of the DL model for diagnosis were as follows: area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator curve 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85), sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.76, and accuracy 76%. For disease severity: AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90), sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.63, and accuracy 80%. Results of validation, diagnosis: AUC 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67-0.97), sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.74, and accuracy 87%. For disease severity: AUC 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67-1.0), sensitivity 1.0, specificity 0.86, and accuracy 94%.
INTERPRETATION: Patterns of facial weakness can be detected with facial recognition software. Second, this study delivers a 'proof of concept' for a DL model that can distinguish MG from HC and classifies disease severity.