m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Annals of plastic surgery · 2008

Should excised keloid scars be sent for routine histologic analysis?

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Gulamhuseinwala Nadim, Mackey Simon, Meagher Peter, Powell Barry

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION: Keloid scarring is a clinical diagnosis, usually preceded by a history of localized trauma. Significant variation exists as to whether excised specimens are sent for routine histologic analysis. We aimed to review the histology of all clinically diagnosed keloids at our unit.

METHODS: All keloids diagnosed clinically and excised were identified between April 1995 and April 2006. The subsequent histology results were analyzed.

RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-eight specimens were sent for pathologic investigation over an 11-year period. Four hundred fifty-eight (81%) were reported as "keloid," 60 (11%) as "acne keloidalis," 35 (6%) as "hypertrophic scar," and 14 (2%) as "normal scar." There were no reported malignancies or dysplasias.

DISCUSSION: These histology results suggest that, given a good clinical suspicion of keloid, it may be unnecessary to send specimens at excision for routine histology.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты