The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2013
Robotic radical hysterectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in FIGO stage IIIB cervical cancer: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Siesto Gabriele, Vitobello Domenico
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The management of advanced cervical cancer is challenging. The administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical hysterectomy has proved to be safe in selected cases. Nevertheless, data on the use of minimally invasive surgery is lacking with this clinical application.
METHODS: A 31 year-old woman was diagnosed with a FIGO stage IIIB squamous cell cervical carcinoma. During multidisciplinary consultation it was decided that she should receive NACT, followed by robotic hysterectomy.
RESULTS: After three cycles of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin), the patient achieved a complete clinical and radiological response. She underwent robotic type III/C2 radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. No complications were recorded. The complete response was confirmed at pathological examination. Two additional cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were administered, and the patient is currently without evidence of disease at 18 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, robotics is a viable option to accomplish radical hysterectomy, including cases of advanced cervical cancer. Further experiences are needed to confirm our findings.
METHODS: A 31 year-old woman was diagnosed with a FIGO stage IIIB squamous cell cervical carcinoma. During multidisciplinary consultation it was decided that she should receive NACT, followed by robotic hysterectomy.
RESULTS: After three cycles of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin), the patient achieved a complete clinical and radiological response. She underwent robotic type III/C2 radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. No complications were recorded. The complete response was confirmed at pathological examination. Two additional cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were administered, and the patient is currently without evidence of disease at 18 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, robotics is a viable option to accomplish radical hysterectomy, including cases of advanced cervical cancer. Further experiences are needed to confirm our findings.