Head & neck · 2010
Utility of CT surveillance for primary site recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sullivan Brian P, Parks Karen A, Dean Nichole R, Rosenthal Eben L, Carroll William R, Magnuson J Scott
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The literature directly comparing the utility of clinical examination (CE) to that of CT in detecting recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) for primary site recurrences is lacking.
METHODS: Patients who received both CT scans and CEs after primary treatment for SCC of the upper aerodigestive tract (oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx) were identified. Individual CT scans and CEs were evaluated for their ability to detect recurrence status.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent a total of 886 CEs and 346 CT scans during the follow-up period. The sensitivity for CE and CT was 84.0% and 66.7%, respectively; for specificity, 98.7% and 90.7%, respectively; for positive predictive value, 65.6% and 31.8%, respectively; and for negative predictive value the values were 99.5% and 97.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Due to the low sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT scans compared to physical examination in evaluating primary site tumor recurrences, the utility of CT for surveillance may be limited.
METHODS: Patients who received both CT scans and CEs after primary treatment for SCC of the upper aerodigestive tract (oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx) were identified. Individual CT scans and CEs were evaluated for their ability to detect recurrence status.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients underwent a total of 886 CEs and 346 CT scans during the follow-up period. The sensitivity for CE and CT was 84.0% and 66.7%, respectively; for specificity, 98.7% and 90.7%, respectively; for positive predictive value, 65.6% and 31.8%, respectively; and for negative predictive value the values were 99.5% and 97.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Due to the low sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT scans compared to physical examination in evaluating primary site tumor recurrences, the utility of CT for surveillance may be limited.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyConfidence IntervalsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPhysical ExaminationPredictive Value of TestsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTomography, X-Ray Computed