A comparison of primary laser versus laser after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: To compare characteristics of laser treatment for high-risk type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in eyes treated with primary laser versus laser after an initial treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF).

METHODS

The medical records of consecutive patients at a single academic institution treated for type 1 ROP before 36 weeks' postmenstrual age with primary laser versus laser after initial treatment with anti-VEGF were reviewed retrospectively. Outcome measures were laser spot number, mean laser power, total laser energy (Joules), and retinal vascularization to the nasal ora at time of laser treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with the 46 eyes treated with primary laser, the 46 eyes treated with laser after anti-VEGF required fewer spots (mean, 775 vs 1418 [P < 0.01]), less power (182 vs 223 mW [P < 0.01]), and less total energy (27 vs 61 Joules [P < 0.01]), and showed greater vascularization to the nasal ora at the time of laser treatment (47.8% vs 6.5% [P < 0.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, laser after initial anti-VEGF treatment may have allowed for greater retinal vascularization and been less destructive than primary laser for high-risk type 1 ROP.