Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2022
A retrospective analysis of ultra-widefield photograph (Optos) documentation of retinopathy of prematurity at a tertiary eye care outpatient setup: the Indian Twin Cities ROP Study, report number 11.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jayanna Sushma, Agarwal Komal, Doshi Virangi, Reddy Rakshi Ugandhar, Ali Hasnat, Dogra Avantika, Takkar Brijesh, Agarwal Hitesh, Padhi Tapas Ranjan, Chittabhathini Srilakshmi, Jalali Subhadra
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the usefulness of ultrawide-field fundus (UWF) photography for documentation in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
METHODS: The medical records of infants with ROP who underwent at least one sitting of UWF fundus photography in addition to binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) from April 2018 to September 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. BIO was conducted by a trained ROP specialist, and final diagnosis and treatment were based solely on BIO findings. All fundus photographs were captured on Optos UWF camera (Dunfermline, UK) in a flying baby position. Demographic details and fundus findings on BIO and fundus photographs were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 187 infants who met inclusion criteria for successful imaging, 22 (11.7%) had findings that were discordant with BIO. Although no posterior disease was missed, 4 infants who received treatment would not have been treated based solely on UWF photography findings. Of the 60 babies whose images did not meet the inclusion criteria for successful imaging, 41 had ROP that required intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, UWF photography proved useful in documenting the initial and follow-up findings of preterm babies with ROP.
METHODS: The medical records of infants with ROP who underwent at least one sitting of UWF fundus photography in addition to binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) from April 2018 to September 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. BIO was conducted by a trained ROP specialist, and final diagnosis and treatment were based solely on BIO findings. All fundus photographs were captured on Optos UWF camera (Dunfermline, UK) in a flying baby position. Demographic details and fundus findings on BIO and fundus photographs were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 187 infants who met inclusion criteria for successful imaging, 22 (11.7%) had findings that were discordant with BIO. Although no posterior disease was missed, 4 infants who received treatment would not have been treated based solely on UWF photography findings. Of the 60 babies whose images did not meet the inclusion criteria for successful imaging, 41 had ROP that required intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, UWF photography proved useful in documenting the initial and follow-up findings of preterm babies with ROP.