Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2020
Measuring Functional Status in Huntington's Disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gibson Jessie S, Ridner Sheila H, Dietrich Mary S, Sohn Michael B, Rhoten Bethany A, Claassen Daniel O
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric and cognitive symptoms account for substantial morbidity in Huntington's disease (HD), but their impact on functional status may not be captured using the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) scale. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of motor, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric symptoms on functional status in persons with HD, comparing two instruments.
METHODS: Multiple regression analyses assessed the relationship between neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and motor symptoms and functional status as measured using TFC and Adult Functional Adaptive Behavior (AFAB) scales.
RESULTS: Greater burden of neuropsychiatric (P = 0.017), cognitive (P = 0.001), and motor (P = 0.001) symptoms was associated with greater impairments to functional status as measured by the AFAB scale. Only motor symptoms were associated with TFC scores (P = 0.002). The 3 symptom domains explained more of the variance in AFAB than TFC scores (P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: TFC may have limited applicability, particularly in early-stage HD patients, as a measure of functional status. The AFAB scale can be used in HD studies as a more holistic measure of functional status. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
METHODS: Multiple regression analyses assessed the relationship between neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and motor symptoms and functional status as measured using TFC and Adult Functional Adaptive Behavior (AFAB) scales.
RESULTS: Greater burden of neuropsychiatric (P = 0.017), cognitive (P = 0.001), and motor (P = 0.001) symptoms was associated with greater impairments to functional status as measured by the AFAB scale. Only motor symptoms were associated with TFC scores (P = 0.002). The 3 symptom domains explained more of the variance in AFAB than TFC scores (P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: TFC may have limited applicability, particularly in early-stage HD patients, as a measure of functional status. The AFAB scale can be used in HD studies as a more holistic measure of functional status. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.